2016
DOI: 10.3390/en9120993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Controller Design of PV Micro Inverter without Using Electrolytic Capacitors and Input Current Sensors

Abstract: This paper outlines the modeling and controller design of a novel two-stage photovoltaic (PV) micro inverter (MI) that eliminates the need for an electrolytic capacitor (E-cap) and input current sensor. The proposed MI uses an active-clamped current-fed push-pull DC-DC converter, cascaded with a full-bridge inverter. Three strategies are proposed to cope with the inherent limitations of a two-stage PV MI: (i) high-speed DC bus voltage regulation using an integrator to deal with the 2nd harmonic voltage ripples… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to address the mismatch problem in large strings is to employ MPPT at the individual panel level using microinverters. Figure 1 shows the system diagram of the isolated PV microinverter mounted on each PV panel [9][10][11]. The pre-stage DC-DC converter provides isolation and controls the PV panel to extract its maximum power and provides a high-voltage DC bus for the post-stage DC-AC inverter [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to address the mismatch problem in large strings is to employ MPPT at the individual panel level using microinverters. Figure 1 shows the system diagram of the isolated PV microinverter mounted on each PV panel [9][10][11]. The pre-stage DC-DC converter provides isolation and controls the PV panel to extract its maximum power and provides a high-voltage DC bus for the post-stage DC-AC inverter [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, failure of the PCS affects the reliability of the whole system. On the other hand, the microinverter configuration shown in Figure 1b, also referred to as the module-integrated converter (MIC), uses individual small PCSs mounted on each PV module, allowing a simple "plug and play" installation and more localized control such as independent maximum power point tracking (MPPT) at the individual PV module scale [15][16][17][18]. Compared to the centralized PCS configuration, this system is expected to be more reliable with higher energy yield, which justifies its minor cost increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the design criteria of the inductor can then be derived as Eqs. (1) to (4). Moreover, the peak value of each phase input current can also be derived as Eq.…”
Section: Circuit Topology and Operation Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a DC input power with about 156 or 312 V is required for the conventional single-phase inverter to provide the 110 or 220 V AC output power, respectively. (1)(2)(3)(4) Therefore, a step-up DC converter would be required to boost the 48 V DC power up to at least 156 or 312 V. Compared with the conventional boost converter, the coupled-inductor boost converter could more easily provide a high-voltage step-up ratio. (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) However, the resulting current ripple in the low-voltage side would become higher than that in conventional topology, which would also result in additional power losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%