2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2020.3043495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Enhancing Low-Quality Retinal Fundus Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operating a smartphone-based fundus camera requires some skills that non-specialists in ophthalmology may lack. Variability between operators of a medical device may compromise screening results [49]. Considering 3 EyeFundusScope operators, k of 0.8, k maximum amplitude of 0.2, diabetic retinopathy prevalence of 20% and 95% confidence intervals, the sample size estimate for reproducibility calculations is 200 individuals with diabetes for the study of interoperator reproducibility, and 200 individuals with diabetes for the study of intraoperator reproducibility.…”
Section: Inter and Intraoperator Agreement And Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Operating a smartphone-based fundus camera requires some skills that non-specialists in ophthalmology may lack. Variability between operators of a medical device may compromise screening results [49]. Considering 3 EyeFundusScope operators, k of 0.8, k maximum amplitude of 0.2, diabetic retinopathy prevalence of 20% and 95% confidence intervals, the sample size estimate for reproducibility calculations is 200 individuals with diabetes for the study of interoperator reproducibility, and 200 individuals with diabetes for the study of intraoperator reproducibility.…”
Section: Inter and Intraoperator Agreement And Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the proportion of ungradable images in people with central cataracts accounts for 57% of ungradable images, and the more the years after diagnosis of diabetes, the higher is the proportion of ungradable images [48]. Moreover, the skill of each operator influences the quality of images, and although we expect it to vary for each operator, we need to assess if these differences affect the AI classification for diabetic retinopathy [49].…”
Section: Introduction 1background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for those samples with under-exposure or slight over-exposure, it could lead to great improvement in overall visual quality that is well aligned to human perception, resulting in a better high-quality score. Some fundus degradation factors, such as light transmission disturbance [42] and absence of exposure, could impair observation and fovea localization. The illumination regularization is an appropriate way for overcoming degradation factors to a large extent, thereby improving fovea localization.…”
Section: F Ablation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different equipments and ophthalmologists pose large variations to the quality of fundus images. A screening study of 5,575 patients found that about 12% of [13] and Cofe-Net [58], fail to recover the LQ images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been applied to learn the end-to-end mapping function of fundus image restoration. Although impressive results have been achieved, the CNN-based methods [13,45,47,56,58,68,78] show limitations in capturing long-range dependencies. In recent years, the natural language processing (NLP) model, Transformer [63] has been introduced into computer vision and outperformed CNN methods in many tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%