Modeling and Evaluation of a Coal Power Plant with Biomass Cofiring and CO2 Capture

Abstract

Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions into the atmosphere, with more than 9.5 billion tonnes of CO 2 emitted annually. In order to mitigate the emissions of CO 2 from coal-fired plants, several measures were proposed, such as increasing the efficiency of the plants, cofiring biomass with coal, and capturing and storing CO 2 deep underground. Among these measures, the use of biomass, which is considered one of the most cost-effective renewables and, in addition, carbon neutral, combined with CO 2 capture and storage will play an important role toward reducing the fossil-based CO 2 emissions. In this study, we investigated in detail the performances of pulverized coal combustion plants with direct cofiring of biomass and integrated with an amine-based postcombustion capture technology. All the systems were modeled and simulated using the process simulation software Aspen Plus. The results indicate that cofiring 10% of biomass in a coal-based power plant only slightly affects the energy performance of the plant, reducing the net efficiency by 0.3% points. The addition of an amine capture system to both the coal-fired and biomass cofiring plants further reduces the efficiency of the plants by more than 10% points. Analyzing the effect of various CO 2 capture process parameters on the heat, solvent and cooling water requirements, and on the overall plant performance, it was found that the concentration of amine in the solution is the most important parameter. The results showed that the net electrical efficiency increases for systems using higher amine concentrations. Further, we investigated the effect of systems with lower heat requirement for solvent regeneration on the plant gross/net power output and also analyzed the plant performances under a flexible CO 2 capture efficiency.

Optimizing Forest-Biomass-Distribution Logistics from a Multi-Level Perspective—Review

“…Technological and business research aims to assess the cost feasibility of processes for using wood biomass to produce a specific type of energy product [38][39][40] or wood product [52][53][54][55][56][57]. Business evaluation involves comparing the use of different raw materials [58][59][60][61], pre-processing technologies [62,63], product manufacturing [29,[64][65][66], plant locations [67][68][69], or alternative products [70][71][72][73] in supply chain configuration. The most frequent business indicators in this group of studies were the obtained manufacturing cost ratios and the internal rate of return of the adopted technology.…”