1993
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(93)90070-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and experimental evaluation of an aerosol generator for very high number currents based on a free turbulent jet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such situations a kinetic approach is favored over a classical one, since thermodynamic equilibrium may not be achieved on the timescales of interest. Collision-controlled particle formation and evolution have previously been studied in chemically reacting systems [McMurry and Friedlander, 1979;McMurry, 1983] and turbulent jets [Delattre and Friedlander, 1978;Koch et al, 1993], where theoretical results are found to be consistent with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In such situations a kinetic approach is favored over a classical one, since thermodynamic equilibrium may not be achieved on the timescales of interest. Collision-controlled particle formation and evolution have previously been studied in chemically reacting systems [McMurry and Friedlander, 1979;McMurry, 1983] and turbulent jets [Delattre and Friedlander, 1978;Koch et al, 1993], where theoretical results are found to be consistent with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Theoretical studies of nucleation in turbulent condensing jets were conducted by Higuchi and O'Konski (1960), Lothe and Pound (1962), and Sutugin and Fuchs (1968). Relevant experimental studies were carried out by Langmuir (1942), Hottel (1942), Levine and Friedlander (1960), Hidy and Friedlander (1964), and Brock et al (1986), and more recently by Strum and Toor (1992), Koch et al (1993), Vatazhin et al (1995), Friedlander (1997, 1998), Lesniewski and Koch (1998), and Barrett (2000). Factors which may have an effect on the particle size distribution of the condensed aerosol are: (1) mass of substance vaporized per second, (2) mass of admixed or entrained air per unit weight of substance, (3) exit velocity of vapor emerging from the nozzle, (4) exit temperature of vapor emerging from the nozzle, (5) "seed" particle size as well as composition and number concentration, and (6) physico-chemical properties of the substance vaporized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of generator uses a two-step process where nuclei of a very high boiling point compound are produced and the lower boiling compound is then condensed on the nuclei. The final particle size distribution depends on the nucleation rate and subsequent particle growth as discussed in texts (Friedlander 2000) and papers (Koch et al 1993;Barrett and Baldwin 2000;Singh et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood et al (1996) used a condensation generator to produce 0.6-1.4 µm diameter cocaine aerosols for animal studies. An extensive keyword literature search, Science Citation Index search, and review of citations contained in papers on organic particle generation (Koch et al 1993;Dubtsov and Baklanov 1996;Ristovski et al 1998) revealed no prior report of a laboratory condensation particle generator producing hydrocarbon aerosols smaller than 100 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%