Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
As part of the stimulation plan to obtain the optimum slickwater frac design in the main source rock play in Saudi Arabia, a series of systematic trials were carried out testing different frac design parameters, such as the proppant volumes and types, and fluid & additives volumes (friction reducers, spearhead acid etc.). These trials were carefully designed in several 4-well pads across the field, comparing different designs in wells next to each other in the same pad, to allow consistency in reservoir and geology conditions allowing the trials to be conclusive. Wells were flowed back for a relatively short period of time and different production analysis techniques were used to compare the different designs against the standard. In this paper, the Normalized Initial Productivity Index of the wells was compared using the Gas, Gas Equivalent, Total Fluid Downhole Flow Rates Productivity Index (PI), and the Effective Fracture Lengths from rate transient analysis were used to help on selecting the optimum frac designs. In these trials, other important completion parameters were kept constant: the number of clusters per stage, cluster spacing, type of perforation guns, frac fluid and proppant type. The flowrates are measured using the three phase separators and the corresponding bottom-hole flowing pressures are estimated using multi-phase flow parameters, and the matched wellbore hydraulic models. The reservoir pressure is estimated from the pressure decline analysis of the frac stages along the lateral. The results show that there was almost no change in the productivity results by lowering the proppant volumes 25%. The results also show that better wells are obtained by lowering fluid volumes by 33% and decreasing the additive volumes by more than 75%. Overall, the improved PI obtained with lower proppant and fluid volumes and less additive concentrations, provided an optimized frac design that is being carried into the development phase wells. This paper helps in understanding and maximizing the productivity of the wells and optimizing the design including chemicals, to capitalize the value generation from the individual wells on the multi-well pads.
As part of the stimulation plan to obtain the optimum slickwater frac design in the main source rock play in Saudi Arabia, a series of systematic trials were carried out testing different frac design parameters, such as the proppant volumes and types, and fluid & additives volumes (friction reducers, spearhead acid etc.). These trials were carefully designed in several 4-well pads across the field, comparing different designs in wells next to each other in the same pad, to allow consistency in reservoir and geology conditions allowing the trials to be conclusive. Wells were flowed back for a relatively short period of time and different production analysis techniques were used to compare the different designs against the standard. In this paper, the Normalized Initial Productivity Index of the wells was compared using the Gas, Gas Equivalent, Total Fluid Downhole Flow Rates Productivity Index (PI), and the Effective Fracture Lengths from rate transient analysis were used to help on selecting the optimum frac designs. In these trials, other important completion parameters were kept constant: the number of clusters per stage, cluster spacing, type of perforation guns, frac fluid and proppant type. The flowrates are measured using the three phase separators and the corresponding bottom-hole flowing pressures are estimated using multi-phase flow parameters, and the matched wellbore hydraulic models. The reservoir pressure is estimated from the pressure decline analysis of the frac stages along the lateral. The results show that there was almost no change in the productivity results by lowering the proppant volumes 25%. The results also show that better wells are obtained by lowering fluid volumes by 33% and decreasing the additive volumes by more than 75%. Overall, the improved PI obtained with lower proppant and fluid volumes and less additive concentrations, provided an optimized frac design that is being carried into the development phase wells. This paper helps in understanding and maximizing the productivity of the wells and optimizing the design including chemicals, to capitalize the value generation from the individual wells on the multi-well pads.
The objective of this paper is to showcase the work done to improve proppant placement using high viscous friction reducers in Saudi unconventional reservoirs. Clean-based fluids, mainly water with friction reducer additives, do not exhibit enough viscosity to place the desired proppant volume. Nevertheless, the respective production results made clean-based fluids outperform heavy-based fluids (guar gum-based fluids with cross-link additives). As the friction reducer is the main chemical to be pumped with water forming the clean-based fluid, as known as slickwater, its optimization is vital in placing the desired proppant volume by using minimal water volume. The optimization comes from two results: friction reducer type and concentration. To determine the best suited type of friction reducer to increase the viscosity of the fracture fluid and reduce drag/friction, lab experiments have been conducted using the available friction reducer types in the industry. Water samples from the field have been collected and was then tested to determine the water quality. Different additives were added and their viscosities were measured using rheometers at surface and downhole temperatures. High-Viscous Friction Reducers (HVFRs) generated the best viscosity at both surface and downhole conditions, when compared to other friction reducers in the market. To determine the optimum concentration of HVFR, different concentrations were used in the high temperature rheometers at surface and bottomhole conditions. The results show exponential relationship between the concentration and the viscosity of HVFR. The second phase of the project is measuring the resultant conductivity of the HVFR. A lab experiment was conducted using a conductivity cell to measure the conductivity of a proppant pack. A sensitivity analysis was conducted, changing the fluid type inside the proppant pack. Slickwater with HVFR showed better performance than linear gel and crosslink fluids, and showed similar performance to other friction reducers from a conductivity point of view. The third phase of the project is the field test. A well was selected for the trial test where the well lateral was landed in a very challenging zone for proppant placement. The well's average proppant placement percentage was 62%, significantly hindering its expected production results. With the advent of HVFR, the proppant percentage improved significantly to 98%. The paper highlights the importance of HVFRs in improving proppant placement in challenging unconventional reservoirs, to improve well productivity. This work summarizes the lab tests conducted to ensure placement would be achieved when used in the field, without jeopardizing the production results due to the enhanced viscosity/reduced friction. This work provides a breakthrough in slickwater placements in unconventional reservoirs, as this fracture fluid has become commonplace in Saudi unconventional reservoirs, and in many other unconventional reservoirs around the globe.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.