2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and forecasting realized portfolio weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the IP-correction factors should be newly derived for each particular measure, however, this challenging task is beyond the scope of our paper and is left for future research, as e.g. the task of deriving IP correction factors for realized portfolio weights (Golosnoy et al 2019, 2020, or Golosnoy and Gribisch 2022. The impact of IP on these additional estimators is investigated in the follow-up paper of Dette et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussion and Further Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the IP-correction factors should be newly derived for each particular measure, however, this challenging task is beyond the scope of our paper and is left for future research, as e.g. the task of deriving IP correction factors for realized portfolio weights (Golosnoy et al 2019, 2020, or Golosnoy and Gribisch 2022. The impact of IP on these additional estimators is investigated in the follow-up paper of Dette et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussion and Further Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers like Golosnoy and Gribisch [24] advocate for incorporating specific risk measures into portfolio construction. Metrics such as Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) capture tail risk and extreme events.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, like Golosnoy and Gribisch [24], have incorporated specific risk measures, while studies [25][26][27][28][29][30] have catered strategies to different investor risk preferences. These studies emphasize accounting for tail risk and skewness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%