2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4328-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Numerical Analysis of a Cervical Spine Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite element analysis was performed based on geometrical information provided by clinical data. Computed tomography (CT) images of the upper limb, possessing the broken LCP, were acquired and the DICOM files imported in MIMICS 10.1 (Materialise Inc., Leeuwen, Belgium) in order to generate the 3D reconstruction [23,24]. The raw volumes were digitally processed for further refined and mesh repairing using Geomagic Studio 9 (3D Systems, Morrisville, NC, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element analysis was performed based on geometrical information provided by clinical data. Computed tomography (CT) images of the upper limb, possessing the broken LCP, were acquired and the DICOM files imported in MIMICS 10.1 (Materialise Inc., Leeuwen, Belgium) in order to generate the 3D reconstruction [23,24]. The raw volumes were digitally processed for further refined and mesh repairing using Geomagic Studio 9 (3D Systems, Morrisville, NC, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of the geometric model was accomplished by reconstructing a set of computer tomography images of an unaffected natural molar. This reverse engineering technique allowed us to achieve accurate shape and dimensions of the tooth and to reproduce the finest geometric features [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The reconstruction was made in MIMICS 10.1 (Materialise Inc., Leeuwen, Belgium), in which the 3D geometry was achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%