2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1178-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and optimization of manufacturing process performance using Modelica graphical representation and process analytics formalism

Abstract: This paper concerns the development of a design methodology and its demonstration through a prototype system for performance modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes. The design methodology uses a Modelica simulation tool serving as the graphical user interface for manufacturing domain users such as process engineers to formulate their problems. The Process Analytics Formalism, developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, serves as a bridge between the Modelica classes and a com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, an advantage of analytical techniques is the ease of computing using explicit mathematical formulas and numerical computation methods [19]. As observed by Shao et al [20], simulation-based evaluations are customised for special purposes and are difficult to apply them to other scenarios. Although all these drawbacks are significant, applying analytical techniques as alternative way of performance evaluation seems to be far less popular in manufacturing optimisation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an advantage of analytical techniques is the ease of computing using explicit mathematical formulas and numerical computation methods [19]. As observed by Shao et al [20], simulation-based evaluations are customised for special purposes and are difficult to apply them to other scenarios. Although all these drawbacks are significant, applying analytical techniques as alternative way of performance evaluation seems to be far less popular in manufacturing optimisation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%