2022
DOI: 10.1002/ep.14059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and optimization of NO emission for a steam power plant by data‐driven methods

Abstract: The evolution of the power industry toward large-scale automation and selfmonitoring provides the opportunity to optimize the technical and environmental performance of the plant with data-driven methods with little changes in infrastructure. This article applies the artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) to predicting and optimizing NO emissions. Multiple linear regression models, correlation matrix, and research background are employed to find the most influential input features. The gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, MLP was not a very good fit for dust. The R 2 values in the CO and dust data to which the MLP model was applied are far from 1.0, which means that the values predicted by the model with these data and the actual values were quite far from each other (Movahed et al, 2023;Tang et al, 2022). As it can be seen from the R 2 values, the predicted and the actual data of O 2 , NOx, and SO 2 levels were closer to each other when using MLP model.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Using Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, MLP was not a very good fit for dust. The R 2 values in the CO and dust data to which the MLP model was applied are far from 1.0, which means that the values predicted by the model with these data and the actual values were quite far from each other (Movahed et al, 2023;Tang et al, 2022). As it can be seen from the R 2 values, the predicted and the actual data of O 2 , NOx, and SO 2 levels were closer to each other when using MLP model.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Using Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Due to the capacity of AI to detect complex temporal patterns and non-linear correlations in data, these models are more accurate in predicting the stack-gas emissions of coal-fired power plants than conventional techniques (Alnaim et al, 2022;Laubscher, 2019). Previous studies, such as those by Krzywanski & Nowak, 2016, Vujić et al, 2019, Tang et al, 2022, Chikobvu & Mamba, 2023, Movahed et al, 2023, and Josimović et al, 2023 have explored AI-driven models for forecasting specific pollutants such as CO, NOx, NO 2 , PM 2.5 , and SO 2 . These researches have primarily focused on individual pollutants, resulting in a limited number of studies that have comprehensively addressed the forecasting of all pollutants emitted from coal-fired power plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%