2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12152860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and Optimizing a Chiller System Using a Machine Learning Algorithm

Abstract: This study was conducted to develop an energy consumption model of a chiller in a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system using a machine learning algorithm based on artificial neural networks. The proposed chiller energy consumption model was evaluated for accuracy in terms of input layers that include the number of input variables, amount (proportion) of training data, and number of neurons. A standardized reference building was also modeled to generate operational data for the chiller system durin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the literature shows, predictions that use machine learning algorithms offer advantages in that they do not require complex modeling compared to simulation methods that are based on mathematical models. As shown, researchers have conducted various studies of heating and cooling load prediction methods that employ machine learning algorithms [12][13][14][15][16]. However, in order to improve the accuracy of such predictions, the researchers either combined several neural network models or utilized complex structures, such as deep layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the literature shows, predictions that use machine learning algorithms offer advantages in that they do not require complex modeling compared to simulation methods that are based on mathematical models. As shown, researchers have conducted various studies of heating and cooling load prediction methods that employ machine learning algorithms [12][13][14][15][16]. However, in order to improve the accuracy of such predictions, the researchers either combined several neural network models or utilized complex structures, such as deep layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P total = 2374.21 from the GA algorithm. Moreover, the propose algorithm is able to give the distribution of P total in Figure 8 for all points satisfying the indoor temperature constraint in (17). In order to observe the interior of Figure 8a, the 3D cloud image in Figure 8a is unfolded along the z axis (R CHW ), and twenty 2D cloud images are obtained as shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zakula et al [16] took the adaptive grid search technique to map the optimal heat pump performance as a function of the capacity, indoor and outdoor temperatures. Kim et al [17] developed an energy performance prediction and optimization software to predict and optimize the energy consumption of a chiller system using a machine learning algorithm based on artificial neural network (ANN) models. Kusiak et al [18] adopted the multi-layer perception (MLP) algorithm to construct energy consumption predictive models of an air handling unit, and the dynamic penalty-based electromagnetism-like algorithm (DPEM) to minimize the overall energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research team is developing a centralized air conditioning system and energy management technique for BEMS applications and has researched energy consumption and load predictions based on ANN (Artificial Neural Networks). Using ANN models, the team conducted a prediction study of chiller energy consumption and achieved results that satisfy the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) criteria, with an average CV(RMSE) of 19.49% in the training period and an average CV(RMSE) of 22.83% in the testing period [17]. In addition, the team conducted studies to optimize the cooling load prediction model based on MATLAB's NARX (with eXigenous) Feedforward Neural Networks model to confirm that a forecast accuracy of less than 7% CV(RMSE) can be obtained depending on the conditions [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%