2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and performance evaluation of parabolic trough solar collector desalination system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a review study [9], the PTC performance was found to be dependent on the optical efficiency, circulating fluid heat transfer coefficient, heat flux, reflectance of the reflector, the absorptance, the diameter of the absorber and the length of the collector. The PTC has been used in the desalination field due to its superior performance in solar light tracking and focal receiving [10]. The parabolic concentrator tracking system is used [11] with the tubular solar still for the purpose of desalination, and the resultant production capacities are 0.28, 0.214 and 1.66 L/day, with a production cost of 0.033, 0.044 and 0.024 US$/L, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review study [9], the PTC performance was found to be dependent on the optical efficiency, circulating fluid heat transfer coefficient, heat flux, reflectance of the reflector, the absorptance, the diameter of the absorber and the length of the collector. The PTC has been used in the desalination field due to its superior performance in solar light tracking and focal receiving [10]. The parabolic concentrator tracking system is used [11] with the tubular solar still for the purpose of desalination, and the resultant production capacities are 0.28, 0.214 and 1.66 L/day, with a production cost of 0.033, 0.044 and 0.024 US$/L, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference case could potentially produce 1.72 litres/h at the observed thermal efficiency in Zagazig, surpassing the maximal yield reported by Chaouchi et al [38] (1.27 litres/h), with minimal carbon footprint. Nevertheless, the maximal productivity of this system was inferior to Nafaa et al [27] and Arun and Sreekumar's [36] highest production rates (2.952 kg/h and 2.3 kg/h, respectively), because of design's CR and the utilisation of stainless steel (grade 316) as a receiver tube. However, the improvement procedure resulted in enhancing the system's productivity drastically.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A similar system was also examined by Arun and Sreekumar [36] at solar intensities ranging from 415 to 715 W/m 2 . Initially, they investigated the performance of the system with a stainless steel receiver tube and glass covered copper by measuring the inlet and outlet temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hang and Mingtao 23 designed a parabolic collector with a rim angle of 84°, length of 4.2 m, aperture area of 6.72 m 2 , and efficiency of 72%. Arun and Sreekumar 24 investigated the performance of the PTC equipped with a solar still for desalination using absorber tubes of different materials with yield 2 L/m 2 . Mosleh et al 25 used a grouping of the heat pipe and evacuated tube with the PTC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%