2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of dynamic reliability is the possibility to address the evaluation of a system both in terms of dependability attributes (reliability, availability and maintenance) and performance (production and other relevant key performance indicators, like the service availability). Several contributions in industrial [37] and nuclear applications have already shown the improved accuracy of this modelling paradigm [14,38], supported also by other works [39][40][41][42][43] addressing the evaluation of the failure rates with respect to the system working conditions. Unfortunately, the failure behavior of a system component with respect to the system operating conditions is not always known [44,45] and this represents the most important limitation for the use of dynamic reliability approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The main advantage of dynamic reliability is the possibility to address the evaluation of a system both in terms of dependability attributes (reliability, availability and maintenance) and performance (production and other relevant key performance indicators, like the service availability). Several contributions in industrial [37] and nuclear applications have already shown the improved accuracy of this modelling paradigm [14,38], supported also by other works [39][40][41][42][43] addressing the evaluation of the failure rates with respect to the system working conditions. Unfortunately, the failure behavior of a system component with respect to the system operating conditions is not always known [44,45] and this represents the most important limitation for the use of dynamic reliability approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Its full description can be found in Aubry and colleagues. 23,24 This case study touches upon the secondary water circuit of power plant and it has been defined in the context of dynamic reliability. In this article, only the structure of the system is taken into account and its components are considered as non-repairable in order to match to proposed approach.…”
Section: Reliability Of Coherent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all components, their failures during operating (for CEX , TPA T , TPA OT , ARE HF , ARE SF ), or break-down or severe leak (for VVP ) are considered. According to Aubry and colleagues, 23,24 the components’ failure rates for these failure modes are provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Reliability Of Coherent Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the number of components in the network is too large for efficient use of this approach; thus, only asymptotic properties should be included (see de Saporta et al or Zhang et al for details). Other approaches based on hybrid automata or stochastic Petri nets (SPN) can be used, but with difficulty due to the large number of components in a WSN (for other complex systems, see Zhang et al, Babykina et al). This type of model may be used for the study of dynamic behaviors in local or global WSNs, with some additional assumptions, for example, see conclusions (Section 8).…”
Section: Pv‐wsn Reliability Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the problem can be formulated in terms of stochastic processes, especially as a piecewise inhomogeneous Markovian process (or semi-Markovian process). Nevertheless, the number of components in the network is too large for efficient use of this approach; thus, only asymptotic properties should be included (see de Saporta et al 33 35 ). This type of model may be used for the study of dynamic behaviors in local or global WSNs, with some additional assumptions, for example, see conclusions (Section 8).…”
Section: Modeling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%