2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202519410045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of bridge-section buffeting response in turbulent flow

Abstract: Buffeting analysis plays an important role in the wind-resistant design of long-span bridges. While computational methods have been widely used in the study of self-excited forces on bridge sections, there is very little work on applying advanced simulation to buffeting analysis. In an effort to address this shortcoming, we developed a framework for the buffeting simulation of bridge sections subjected to turbulent flows. We carry out simulations of a rectangular bridge section with aspect ratio 10 and compute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incident turbulence is generated using the MDM-method of [29]. MDM was first proposed in [30] and can be viewed as a generalization of auxiliary recycling methods of which early formulations for turbulence modeling are reported in [45,46].…”
Section: Modeling Of Incident Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Incident turbulence is generated using the MDM-method of [29]. MDM was first proposed in [30] and can be viewed as a generalization of auxiliary recycling methods of which early formulations for turbulence modeling are reported in [45,46].…”
Section: Modeling Of Incident Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…wind turbines [21], flapping wings [22], turbo-machinery [23], tire aerodynamics [24], channel flow [25], and also bridge aerodynamics [26][27][28][29]. Other key ingredients of the computational framework utilized in this work are the Multi-Domain Modeling (MDM) extension [30,31] for simulation of incident turbulence, the weakly-enforced boundary conditions [32] for relaxing the no-slip boundary condition at solid surfaces, and Jacobian-based stiffening mesh-moving algorithms [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher order continuity and exact geometry representation of CAD basis functions have shown superior solution accuracy of IGA compared with the traditional C 0 FEA. In this way, many researchers have implemented the IGA in various classes of problems, that is, fluid mechanics, [3][4][5][6] fluid-structure interaction, [7][8][9] optimization, [10][11][12][13] shell problems, 14,15 and cracks. [16][17][18][19][20] However, a drawback of NURBS basis functions stems from their tensor-product structure which prohibits a truly local refinement in multidimensional analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the static wind coefficients and flutter derivatives, the aerodynamic admittance has been rarely determined by utilizing CFD. To the authors' knowledge, very few studies exist that obtain the aerodynamic admittance with the grid-based CFD methods (e.g., Uejima et al (2008); Turbelin and Gibert (2001); Bruno et al (2004); Helgedagsurd et al (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%