2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of the distribution of undeformed chip thicknesses in surface grinding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the undeformed chip thickness is investigated based on the interference depth of the AAG tip penetration into the workpiece. And the interference depth of AAG sliding or plowing on the workpiece surface is regarded as undeformed chip thickness which is also argued by Zhang et al [10]. It is manifested clearly in Fig.1 (e-f) that the interference depth is strongly influenced by AAG protruding height and the grinding depth.…”
Section: The Shape Size and Distribution Of Chipsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, the undeformed chip thickness is investigated based on the interference depth of the AAG tip penetration into the workpiece. And the interference depth of AAG sliding or plowing on the workpiece surface is regarded as undeformed chip thickness which is also argued by Zhang et al [10]. It is manifested clearly in Fig.1 (e-f) that the interference depth is strongly influenced by AAG protruding height and the grinding depth.…”
Section: The Shape Size and Distribution Of Chipsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…To account for this, the Rayleigh probability function [8], [9] is presented to describe the stochastic interference depth of grains which is equal to the undeformed chip thickness, f (h) = (h/σ 2 )e −h 2 2σ 2 h ≥ 0 0 h < 0 (4) with an expected value and the variance expressed as E(h) = π 2σ (5) sd(h) = √ 0.429σ (6) where h is the undeformed chip thickness and σ is the parameter defining this function. The Rayleigh distribution touches upon strong assumptions and σ has no clear physical meaning [10]. To further conform to the real situation of abrasive grains distribution, the Monte Carlo method [11] and the vibration method [12] are utilized to randomly generate the diameter and distributed position of the grain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…considering that the thickness of the undeformed chips in the grinding zone is not uniform, but increases gradually from zero to maximum along the contact arc length. The triangular heat source model was found to fit the measured temperature responses more accurately in many previous studies [32], and so the heat source was considered to have a triangular distribution in the present work. Considering the periodic variation of the heat source with time caused by the intermittent feed, the periodic moving heat source model with a triangular distribution at the grinding zone can be described as [14]…”
Section: Heat Source Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The most recent research investigations into modelling the grinding process have usually been based on numerical methods because these have a greater capacity to represent reality in comparison with analytical approaches. In this case, these methods are not only focused on thermal issues [23,24], but also on the characterization of material removal mechanisms [25,26], dressing process performance [27] or methods to advance wheel surface modelling [28]. Doman et al [29] conducted a complete review of the most recent advances in grinding modelling.…”
Section: Process Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%