2010
DOI: 10.1002/atr.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of vehicle projection arrival–discharge process in adaptive traffic signal controls

Abstract: SUMMARYReal-time signal control operates as a function of the vehicular arrival and discharge process to satisfy a prespecified operational performance. This process is often predicted based on loop detectors placed upstream of the signal. In our newly developed signal control for diamond interchanges, a microscopic model is proposed to estimate traffic flows at the stop-line. The model considers the traffic dynamics of vehicular detection, arrivals, and departures, by taking into account varying speeds, lengt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of the adaptive signal control strategy, vehicle arrival prediction based on a single intersection is required. Fang and Elefteriadou [3] proposed a vehicle arrival-dissipation prediction model considering intersection queues, which can solve the problem that the conventional PREDICT algorithm [4] cannot accurately predict the intersection approach lane queue length. However, since the model only microscopically simulates the queue arrival under red light conditions, its vehicle arrival dynamics under green light conditions remain to be investigated.…”
Section: Adaptive Control Methods Based On Traffic Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the adaptive signal control strategy, vehicle arrival prediction based on a single intersection is required. Fang and Elefteriadou [3] proposed a vehicle arrival-dissipation prediction model considering intersection queues, which can solve the problem that the conventional PREDICT algorithm [4] cannot accurately predict the intersection approach lane queue length. However, since the model only microscopically simulates the queue arrival under red light conditions, its vehicle arrival dynamics under green light conditions remain to be investigated.…”
Section: Adaptive Control Methods Based On Traffic Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the status and function of the traffic forecasting module in the traffic control model, the typical traffic signal MBC control method includes Travel-Time Responsive (CTR) traffic signal control algorithm [49], Predictive Model Control [50], Arrival-Discharge Process, and Storage-Forward Response Control. Arrival-Discharge Process signal control algorithm is based on dynamic programming and the optimization of signal policy is performed using a certain performance measure involving delays, queue lengths, and queue storage ratios [51]. Storage-Forward Response Control using a real-time monitoring data of arrival and leaving traffic flow to simulate the movement of the vehicle platoon and realize the predictive control [52].…”
Section: Traffic Self-adaptive Control Methods Based On Mathematical Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Mathematical models (2) Intelligent computing e mathematical model-based control methods work based on the traffic status and the function of traffic forecasting module. Various mathematical MBC methods have been proposed in the literature, but the most important MBC models include the travel-time responsive (CTR) algorithm [20], arrival-discharge process [21], predictive model control [22], and storage-forward response control [23]. TRANSYT [24] and MULTIBAND [25] are two state-of-the-art MBC methods based on the comprehensive performance index and green wave band, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%