“…Large ΔPP values have been associated with male sex (Segers et al, 2009 ; Herbert et al, 2014 ), higher heart rate (Wilkinson et al, 2002 ), height (Asmar et al, 1997 ; Camacho et al, 2004 ), mass index (Pichler et al, 2016 ), pulse transit time (Gao et al, 2016 ; Natarajan et al, 2017 ), and wave reflection coefficient (Gao et al, 2016 ), and lower age (Wilkinson et al, 2001 ; Herbert et al, 2014 ) and pulse wave velocity (Hashimoto and Ito, 2010 ; Pierce et al, 2012 ), and is significantly influenced by cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and obesity (Herbert et al, 2014 ). Experimental and computational models have been used to study the effect on ΔPP of cardiovascular properties (Karamanoglu et al, 1995 ; Figueroa and Humphrey, 2014 ; Mynard and Smolich, 2015 ; Gaddum et al, 2017 ) and age (Charlton et al, 2019 ), showing that ΔPP raises with increasing ventricular inotropy (contractile state of the ventricle), tapering, peripheral load and vessel length; and decreasing wall thickness and age. However, there are currently no methods based on the physics of blood flow in the systemic arterial tree that enable explicit analytical identification of the main cardiovascular determinants of ΔPP—and hence estimation of cPP from peripheral PP (pPP)—from data that can be acquired non-invasively for a specific subject.…”