2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling binding modes of angiotensin II and pseudopeptide analogues to the AT2 receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sköld et al [85] explored the binding modes of Ang II and some pseudopeptide analogues at AT 2 R and found two plausible binding modes in agreement with most of the suggested ligand-receptor contact points reported in the literature. Docking calculations, using MacroModel’s Monte Carlo multiple search minimum, showed that the ionic bridge between Phe 8 (carboxyl) of Ang II and Lys215 (AT 1 R) occurred most frequently in the ligand–receptor configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Sköld et al [85] explored the binding modes of Ang II and some pseudopeptide analogues at AT 2 R and found two plausible binding modes in agreement with most of the suggested ligand-receptor contact points reported in the literature. Docking calculations, using MacroModel’s Monte Carlo multiple search minimum, showed that the ionic bridge between Phe 8 (carboxyl) of Ang II and Lys215 (AT 1 R) occurred most frequently in the ligand–receptor configurations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The species-specific difference implies a shift in ligand selectivity during vertebrate evolution. The known amino acid residues responsible for AT2 binding are Ile 14 , Met 128 , Met 138 , Arg 182 , Lys 215 , His 273 , Asp 279 , and Asp 297 in human (Sköld et al, 2008), and 4 out of the 8 residues are identical between eel and human (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Ligand Selectivity and Binding Characteristics Of Eel At2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). The conserved residues, namely Met 138 , Lys 215 , and His 273 in the human AT2, target the C-terminal region of Ang II (Sköld et al, 2008), and this explains the flexibility of ligand stimulation of the eel AT2 by Ang II, Ang III, and Ang IV, In situ hybridization of gill section using the AT2 sense probe as a negative control. No specific signals were observed.…”
Section: Ligand Selectivity and Binding Characteristics Of Eel At2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMR results of aqueous AngII have also shown AngII in a U-shaped conformation with a turn located between Ile5-His6-Pro7 residues (Spyroulias et al, 2003;Tzakos et al, 2004). In AT 2 -receptor molecular modeling studies, positioning of previously suggested ligandreceptor contacts resulted in AngII adopting a β-extended conformation that extends into the hydrophobic pocket (Boucard et al, 2000;Deraet et al, 2002;Sköld, Nikiforovich, & Karlén, 2008). AngII has been studied using various spectroscopic techniques, but the interpretation of the conformational studies has been inconsistent, most likely from solvent structural dependence, which has led to various structural models for AngII in solution including β pleated sheet, β and γ turns, and other structures (Spyroulias et al, 2003;Tzakos et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%