Bryophyte Ecology and Climate Change 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511779701.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Bryophyte Productivity Across Gradients of Water Availability Using Canopy Form–Function Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor that affects carbon gain of many bryophytes is water availability ( Proctor, 1982 ). Both dehydration and an excessive interstitial water content can inhibit photosynthesis ( Smith, 1982 ; Rice et al, 2011 ; Wagner et al, 2013 ; Supplementary Figure 5 ). Our study confirms that water content also influences the temperatures experienced by Antarctic mosses, with excess water buffering the extremes (decreasing their maximum and increasing their minimum temperatures) and, therefore, reducing the time when mosses experience temperatures higher than 14°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that affects carbon gain of many bryophytes is water availability ( Proctor, 1982 ). Both dehydration and an excessive interstitial water content can inhibit photosynthesis ( Smith, 1982 ; Rice et al, 2011 ; Wagner et al, 2013 ; Supplementary Figure 5 ). Our study confirms that water content also influences the temperatures experienced by Antarctic mosses, with excess water buffering the extremes (decreasing their maximum and increasing their minimum temperatures) and, therefore, reducing the time when mosses experience temperatures higher than 14°C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehydration rate is not easily standardized across bryophyte species (Alpert and Oliver ), because several parameters influence desiccation rate such colony size, shoot morphology and microclimatic conditions (Proctor , Stark , Rice et al ). Dehydration rate can range from fast, takings shoots less than an hour to be desiccated (Oliver et al ), to slower [a few hours; Stark et al ) or very slow (on the order of several hours; Bewley ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been considered difficult to standardize rates of drying across species (Alpert and Oliver, 2002) due to differential drying times among species even when exposed to the same RH. Field studies indicate that colony desiccation rate may be rapid or gradual, depending on the colony size, species, shoot architecture, and local atmospheric conditions (Alpert, 1979; Tuba, 1984; Zotz et al, 2000; Proctor, 2004; Stark, 2005; Rice et al, 2011). By convention, the rate of drying is not given as a rate per se, but as duration until shoots are desiccated, which may or may not reflect different rates of water loss depending upon the technique of desiccation.…”
Section: Ecological Elements Of Dt In Bryophytesmentioning
confidence: 99%