Modeling Cadmium Adsorption using Modified Rice Husk

Mirfazaelian, Hadi; Bavi, A.; Heydari, Z. Shamohammadi

doi:10.13031/2013.36492

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So, FAO Penman and Priestley Taylor models were placed as the second and third best models respectively ( Table 3.2). The results are in agreement with earlier investigators [11].…”

Section: Performance Of Different Reference Evapotranspiration Modelssupporting

confidence: 94%

Evapotranspiration Based Micro Irrigation Scheduling of Tomato Crop under Naturally Ventilated Polyhouse

Sagar

Singh

2019

CJAST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study was undertaken to investigate the Evapotranspiration Based Micro Irrigation Scheduling of Tomato Crop under Naturally Ventilated Polyhouse, at experimental field of Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand during 2017-18. The average of mean monthly ET 0 estimated under polyhouse by FAO-PM (benchmark) model was 39.44 mm, but that of the FAO Penman, Hargreaves, Stanghellini, Priestley-Taylor and FAO Radiation models were 38.37, 18.18, 37.80, 48.17 and 53.87 mm, respectively. Whereas, the average of mean monthly ET 0 estimated under open environment by FAO-PM (benchmark) model was 116.34 mm, but that of the FAO Penman, Hargreaves, Stanghellini, Priestley-Taylor and FAO Radiation models were 119.33, 133, 126.41, 113.17 and 117.37 mm, respectively. The FAO Penman and Hargreaves model are found to be most and least appropriate models for estimating daily ET 0 under polyhouse. Whereas, FAO Radiation and Stanghellini model observed to be most and the least appropriate models in open environment for estimating daily ET 0 under polyhouse for the Pantnagar tarai condition of Uttarakhand. During the six month growing period, the average water requirement for tomato crop under polyhouse and open environments were 0.2149 and 0.2924 liter per day per plant, Original Research Article 2 ), water use efficiency (135.26 kg/m 3 ) and maximum fruit weight (106.66 gm).

show abstract

“…So, FAO Penman and Priestley Taylor models were placed as the second and third best models respectively ( Table 3.2). The results are in agreement with earlier investigators [11].…”

Section: Performance Of Different Reference Evapotranspiration Modelssupporting

confidence: 94%