2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10100-014-0340-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling carbon spot and futures price returns with GARCH and Markov switching GARCH models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MS and MS-GARCH models have been used for several purposes, such as the characterization of stock indexes, currencies or commodities' time series [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. The use of these models for the aforementioned has had also interesting extensions in Fuzzy logic and control applications [71,72].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MS and MS-GARCH models have been used for several purposes, such as the characterization of stock indexes, currencies or commodities' time series [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]. The use of these models for the aforementioned has had also interesting extensions in Fuzzy logic and control applications [71,72].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What's more, due to the simple structure and easy implementation, the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model proposed by Bollerslev (1986) becomes the most popular volatility model. As a consequence, many authors apply the GARCH model to predict EUA futures volatility, see, e.g., Byun and Cho (2013), Zeitlberger and Brauneis (2016), Wang et al (2019), Naik et al (2020), Huang et al (2021). Later, some scholars expand GARCH model and construct TGARCH, GJR-GARCH, ARMAX-GARCH, STR-GARCH models to predict the volatility of carbon futures price (Arouri et al, 2012;Byun and Cho, 2013;Rannou and Barneto, 2016;Sheng et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the quantitative statistical model. They are autoregressive integral moving average (ARIMA) model [6], Generalized Auto Regressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model [7], and ARIMA-GARCH model [8]. However, due to the high complexity and nonlinearity of carbon prices, the prediction results of statistical models are often not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%