2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21949-9_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Cardiac Growth: An Alternative Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a FE model, it would also be possible to evaluate growth in response to spatially distributed changes in stimuli, as induced for example by localized infarctions or electrical conduction disorders. As a drawback, stability of model outcome would not only depend on the growth law, but also on the choice of boundary conditions and possible deterioration of element quality during growth (van Osta et al 2019).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a FE model, it would also be possible to evaluate growth in response to spatially distributed changes in stimuli, as induced for example by localized infarctions or electrical conduction disorders. As a drawback, stability of model outcome would not only depend on the growth law, but also on the choice of boundary conditions and possible deterioration of element quality during growth (van Osta et al 2019).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with finite element (FE) models, our model lacks the ability to describe spatially varying growth in response to spatially varying changes in myocardial load, as induced for example by myocardial infarction or conduction disorders. As an advantage, we avoid the numerical problems that may arise in FE models, typically related to distortion of elements during growth or uncertainty on boundary conditions (van Osta et al 2019). Thus we are better able to test the intrinsic stability of a potential growth law.…”
Section: Considerations On the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such computational models usually combine a growth law based on a growth evolution model, mostly adopting the approaches by Skalak et al [18] and Rodriguez et al [19], where growth was modeled by adding volume in prescribed directions. While conceptually simple, these models suffer from several disadvantages, such as, e.g., the need of defining a priori the direction in which growth will take place or the limit at which growth will stop [20]. Therefore, microstructurally motivated models in a framework such as constrained mixture theory (see section 2.2) could provide deeper insight into the actual events leading to physiological and pathological G&R. To our knowledge, G&R of the heart has not been modelled this way yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%