Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: Food insecurity is a public health challenge that has worsened with increasing cost of living due to inflation and the COVID-19 aftermath. Social and economic inequalities have deepened as communities on the margins especially immigrants experience increased inequities in accessing basic amenities such as housing and food. In Canada, immigrants are experiencing financial and cultural food insecurity. However, limited knowledge exists on the role of collective community gardens in addressing these aspects of food insecurity. Methods: We conducted a community-based participatory research (CBPR) informed by an Afrocentric lens using quantitative and qualitative research methods. Data collection involved an online survey (n=119) which was co-developed and co-administered by our community partners - Sinkunia Community Development Organization (SCDO). The questionnaires were pre-tested with a subsample of community members to ensure reliability and validity of the tool. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were also conducted with purposefully sampled participants (n=10) to obtain nuanced narratives. This study included Black African immigrants from 13 sub-Saharan countries. Individuals from Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, Congo, Côte D’Ivoire, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Uganda and Zimbabwe are represented in the sample. Results: High prevalence of food insecurity (75.6%, n=90) was observed in the sample (n=119), higher than the general Canadian household prevalence rate. Participants recalled experiencing food insecurity ranging from mild (39.5%, n=47) to moderate (26.1%, n=31), and severe (10.1%, n=12) food insecurity in the recall period. High prevalence of cultural food insecurity was also observed, most (80.7%, n=96) of participants reported experiencing deprivation. Participants reported occasional struggles accessing cultural food, primarily due to high costs, limited availability, and worries about the quality. Participants demonstrated resilience and adaptability in maintaining their cultural foodways amid these challenges. About 4 in 5 participants engaged in some form of gardening. Engagement in collective community gardening provided spaces for cultivating connections to food production and shaping Black immigrant individuals’ relationship with the food environment. These “third spaces” serve as cultural melting pots with collective work fostering both intercultural and intergenerational bridges through embedding cultural foodways into children’s everyday experiences. Conclusion: Food insecurity remains a critical issue for Black immigrants in Edmonton, Alberta who are experiencing elevated risk. Our findings contribute to a growing body of evidence on the embodied benefits of community gardens for food security and social placemaking of immigrant populations. High interest and engagement in gardening activities in the population suggests potential for expansion of community-led initiatives.
Background: Food insecurity is a public health challenge that has worsened with increasing cost of living due to inflation and the COVID-19 aftermath. Social and economic inequalities have deepened as communities on the margins especially immigrants experience increased inequities in accessing basic amenities such as housing and food. In Canada, immigrants are experiencing financial and cultural food insecurity. However, limited knowledge exists on the role of collective community gardens in addressing these aspects of food insecurity. Methods: We conducted a community-based participatory research (CBPR) informed by an Afrocentric lens using quantitative and qualitative research methods. Data collection involved an online survey (n=119) which was co-developed and co-administered by our community partners - Sinkunia Community Development Organization (SCDO). The questionnaires were pre-tested with a subsample of community members to ensure reliability and validity of the tool. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were also conducted with purposefully sampled participants (n=10) to obtain nuanced narratives. This study included Black African immigrants from 13 sub-Saharan countries. Individuals from Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, Congo, Côte D’Ivoire, Ghana, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Uganda and Zimbabwe are represented in the sample. Results: High prevalence of food insecurity (75.6%, n=90) was observed in the sample (n=119), higher than the general Canadian household prevalence rate. Participants recalled experiencing food insecurity ranging from mild (39.5%, n=47) to moderate (26.1%, n=31), and severe (10.1%, n=12) food insecurity in the recall period. High prevalence of cultural food insecurity was also observed, most (80.7%, n=96) of participants reported experiencing deprivation. Participants reported occasional struggles accessing cultural food, primarily due to high costs, limited availability, and worries about the quality. Participants demonstrated resilience and adaptability in maintaining their cultural foodways amid these challenges. About 4 in 5 participants engaged in some form of gardening. Engagement in collective community gardening provided spaces for cultivating connections to food production and shaping Black immigrant individuals’ relationship with the food environment. These “third spaces” serve as cultural melting pots with collective work fostering both intercultural and intergenerational bridges through embedding cultural foodways into children’s everyday experiences. Conclusion: Food insecurity remains a critical issue for Black immigrants in Edmonton, Alberta who are experiencing elevated risk. Our findings contribute to a growing body of evidence on the embodied benefits of community gardens for food security and social placemaking of immigrant populations. High interest and engagement in gardening activities in the population suggests potential for expansion of community-led initiatives.
Resettlement communities arising from China’s urbanization process accommodate both landless resettled villagers and non-resettled villagers who migrate to cities for work. Community gardens help increase interactions in resettlement communities and facilitate the integration of resettled residents into the community. This paper, based on the differing characteristics of resettled and non-resettled villagers in China’s resettlement communities and the scarcity of outdoor public space, studies the participation willingness of resettled residents and their preferences for the construction of community gardens. Firstly, this study establishes a system of community garden construction elements for resettlement communities and conducts a Likert scale survey of residents in 30 resettlement communities in Beijing (n = 832). Secondly, variance analysis is used to explore the impact of demographic characteristics on garden preferences. Finally, a multiple linear regression model is employed to study the correlation between resettled residents’ willingness to participate in community gardens and the construction elements. The results show that (1) both resettled villagers and non-villagers have a willingness to participate in community gardens, and the spatial enhancement, facility supplementation, economic compensation, community integration, and identity recognition of garden construction elements are positively correlated with residents’ willingness to participate, with spatial enhancement having the strongest effect; (2) community gardens help achieve integration between resettled and non-resettled villagers; (3) gardens help enhance the identity recognition of resettled villagers. In summary, integrating community gardens into resettlement communities helps increase residents’ social interactions, enhances their sense of belonging, and assists resettled residents in integrating into urban society.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.