2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling compound flooding in coastal systems using a computationally efficient reduced-physics solver: Including fluvial, pluvial, tidal, wind- and wave-driven processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insights from such local studies can aid engineers and risk management officials in performing more robust flood risk assessments that consider compounding effects in the planning, design, and operation of flood risk reduction measures. Approaches for assessing compound flooding include the implementation of hydrodynamic and/or hydrologic models (e.g., Gori et al, 2020;Leijnse et al, 2021;Santiago-Collazo et al, 2019), application of statistical models capable of modelling dependence structures between flooding drivers (Heffernan & Tawn, 2004;Sklar, 1959), or a combination of both (e.g., Moftakhari et al, 2019;Muñoz et al, 2020;Serafin et al, 2019;van den Hurk et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insights from such local studies can aid engineers and risk management officials in performing more robust flood risk assessments that consider compounding effects in the planning, design, and operation of flood risk reduction measures. Approaches for assessing compound flooding include the implementation of hydrodynamic and/or hydrologic models (e.g., Gori et al, 2020;Leijnse et al, 2021;Santiago-Collazo et al, 2019), application of statistical models capable of modelling dependence structures between flooding drivers (Heffernan & Tawn, 2004;Sklar, 1959), or a combination of both (e.g., Moftakhari et al, 2019;Muñoz et al, 2020;Serafin et al, 2019;van den Hurk et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Coriolis as well as advection terms can be turned off, resulting in the local inertial equations. The SFINCS model was successfully applied to reproduce the wave-driven flooding of the village of Hernani in the Philippines during typhoon Haiyan in 2013 [6]. In this study, we apply SFINCS to model onshore inundation forced by the FM model and also-for the first time-to simulate offshore tsunami propagation.…”
Section: Sfincs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the water level time-series computed by the overall FM/SFINCS models for each observation point during the simulation time of 6 h 15 min was separated into incoming and outgoing wave components and only the incoming tsunami wave was applied at the boundaries of the nested SFINCS model. The nested SFINCS model is forced with a slowly and a fast-varying component using a 10-min moving mean using the method of [41] as described in [6], to keep the front of the nested tsunami wave as steep as forced.…”
Section: Sfincs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the key to the successful application of MLMF is choosing an accurate high fidelity model and an appropriate lower fidelity model, which reasonably approximates the high fidelity one. Coastal flood modelling is therefore an ideal field on which to apply MLMF because there exist a large number of high fidelity but computationally expensive full physics models such as XBeach (Roelvink et al, 2009), SWASH (Zijlema et al, 2011), or MIKE21 (Warren and Bach, 1992), and lower fidelity computationally cheaper reduced physics models such as SFINCS (Leijnse et al, 2021), LISFLOOD-FP (Bates et al, 2010) or SBeach (Larson and Kraus, 1989). Furthermore, this work provides an interesting example of a framework for combining lower and high fidelity models in an area where there is already a lot of research into combining different fidelity models (for example Callaghan et al, 2013;Leijnse et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, we choose the depth-averaged finite-volume based coastal ocean model XBeach as our high fidelity model because it can parameterise unresolved wave propagation, such as wind-driven wave fields, and has been successfully used numerous times in the coastal zone to simulate wave propagation and flow including, for example, in Roelvink et al (2018) and de Beer et al (2020). For our lower fidelity model, we use the hydrodynamic model SFINCS (Super-Fast INundation of CoastS) because of its ability to simulate the relevant processes for compound coastal flooding (Leijnse et al, 2021). Note that to maximise computational efficiency, SFINCS does not explicitly solve for short wavelength wind-driven waves internally but instead these can be provided in the form of a prescribed forcing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%