2012
DOI: 10.1214/11-aoas525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling dependent gene expression

Abstract: In this paper we propose a Bayesian approach for inference about dependence of high throughput gene expression. Our goals are to use prior knowledge about pathways to anchor inference about dependence among genes; to account for this dependence while making inferences about differences in mean expression across phenotypes; and to explore differences in the dependence itself across phenotypes. Useful features of the proposed approach are a model-based parsimonious representation of expression as an ordinal outc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Carvalho & Scott [29] show that when the inclusion probability comes from the Beta hyperprior, the model has a strong control over the number of 'false' edges included in the graph. Telesca et al [30] model dependent gene expression through a graph structure similar to the one in our model, and adopt the binomial-beta model for total number of edges; the authors show through simulations that their model returns good control over false discovery rates. One advantage of the Bayesian phylogenetic framework we exploit in formulating our graph hierarchical model is that the framework easily lends itself to combination of different models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Carvalho & Scott [29] show that when the inclusion probability comes from the Beta hyperprior, the model has a strong control over the number of 'false' edges included in the graph. Telesca et al [30] model dependent gene expression through a graph structure similar to the one in our model, and adopt the binomial-beta model for total number of edges; the authors show through simulations that their model returns good control over false discovery rates. One advantage of the Bayesian phylogenetic framework we exploit in formulating our graph hierarchical model is that the framework easily lends itself to combination of different models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating biological knowledge into our prior models is one of the most innovative features of our work. First attempts at incorporating biological network information into a probabilistic model, such as in Wei and Li (2007), have adopted the strategy of translating the "functional" network of KEGG into an undirected graphical model, see also Telesca et al (2008) for a more sophisticated approach. However, different approaches are possible relatively to the way that a network is translated into a graphical model (directed, undirected, chain graph, etc...) and also to the way the marginalization with respect to the non observed genes included in the network is performed.…”
Section: Reply To the Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other contributions to the use of MRF priors for genomic data include Telesca et al (2008), who have proposed a model for the identification of differentially expressed genes that takes into account the dependence structure among genes from available pathways while allowing for correction in the gene network topology. Also, Li and Zhang (2010) incorporate the dependence structure of transcription factors in a regression model with gene expression outcomes; in their approach a network is defined based on the Hamming distance between candidate motifs and used to specify a Markov random field prior for the motif selection indicator.…”
Section: Priors That Incorporate Biological Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus [12], acknowledging the consequent computational and methodological limitations of their techniques, used dynamic BNs to model subsets of series like those we model here. Albeit in a non-exploratory context [19] analysed variations of a baseline model representing known dependence structures. Other graphical studies of regulatory models include [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%