2010
DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2009.4.1603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling dislocation sources and size effects at initial yield in continuum plasticity

Abstract: Size effects at initial yield (prior to stage II) of idealized micron-sized specimens are modeled within a continuum model of plasticity. Two different aspects are considered: specification of a density of dislocation sources that represent the emission of dislocation dipoles, and the presence of an initial, spatially inhomogeneous excess dislocation content. Discreteness of the source distribution appears to lead to a stochastic response in stress-strain curves, with the stochasticity diminishing as the numbe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this theory, mesoscopic plasticity is modeled as an extension of conventional plasticity, which accounts for the effects of dislocation stresses as well as their spatiotemporal evolution in a physically meaningful averaged sense. Numerical results obtained from a finite element implementation of MFDM are in good qualitative agreement with experimental observations and some of the key physically relevant problems has been successfully solved and documented [9,10,11]. Motivated by the experimental observations [4,5], the effect of surface passivation, grain orientation, grain boundary constraints, and film thickness on the mechanical response of multicrystalline thin films is studied using MFDM in [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this theory, mesoscopic plasticity is modeled as an extension of conventional plasticity, which accounts for the effects of dislocation stresses as well as their spatiotemporal evolution in a physically meaningful averaged sense. Numerical results obtained from a finite element implementation of MFDM are in good qualitative agreement with experimental observations and some of the key physically relevant problems has been successfully solved and documented [9,10,11]. Motivated by the experimental observations [4,5], the effect of surface passivation, grain orientation, grain boundary constraints, and film thickness on the mechanical response of multicrystalline thin films is studied using MFDM in [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This was done with finite elements in Acharya (2005, 2006) and in Varadhan et al (2006). Different size effects for single crystalline materials and multicrystalline thin films have been predicted with the MFDM theory as reported in Roy and Acharya (2006), Puri et al (2009) andPuri et al (2011). Grain size distribution and crystallographic orientation effects in multicrystalline thin films were discussed in Puri and Roy (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…These excess dislocations cause plastic deformation in the nonsource regions. This mechanism of modeling dislocation sources in the context of PMFDM is explained in detail in Puri et al [12] In this particular case, the left crystal has the cube orientation, whereas the right crystal is misoriented by 5 deg about the X 3 -axis. Material properties, representative of copper, as described earlier in Section IV, are used in this case, except the rate sensitivity for nonsource regions is set at 1.0 (=m) and 0.03 for source regions.…”
Section: A Grain Boundary As a Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%