In this work, we compared the main characteristics of highly porous geopolymer components for water treatment applications manufactured by 3D printing, direct foaming, or granulation. Furthermore, different approaches to impregnate the materials with Ag or Cu were evaluated to obtain filters with disinfecting or catalytic properties. The results revealed that all of the investigated manufacturing methods enabled the fabrication of components that possessed mesoporosity, suitable mechanical strength, and water permeability, even though their morphologies were completely different. Total porosity and compressive strength values were 28 vol% and 16 MPa for 3D-printed, 70-79 vol% and 1 MPa for direct-foamed, and 27 vol% and 10 MPa for granule samples. Both the filter preparation and the metal impregnation method affected the amount, oxidation state, and stability of Ag and Cu in the filters. However, it was possible to prepare filters with low metal leaching between a pH of 3-7, so that the released Ag and Cu concentrations were within drinking water standards. Cellular ceramics have a high potential in water treatment applications, such as Ag impregnated point-of-use disinfecting filters 1 , slurry dewatering systems 2 , catalyst supports 3 , and micro-or ultrafiltration membranes 4. However, although ceramic materials have good chemical and physical stability, their higher price in comparison to organic polymers has hindered more widespread use in industrial water treatment 5,6. Geopolymers, on the other hand, are amorphous, low-calcium, aluminosilicate, ceramic-like materials with structural mesoporosity (i.e., pore diameter 2-50 nm) 7 ; good mechanical and chemical stability 8 ; and cation-exchange capacity 9. However, in contrast to conventional ceramics, geopolymers consolidate at (near) ambient conditions without high-temperature sintering. Consequently, geopolymer technology could offer a possibility for clean and low-cost production of ceramic-like filters, possessing better chemical stability, and a longer lifespan than polymeric components. In the context of water and wastewater treatment, geopolymers have already been investigated for a number of applications, such as adsorbents/ion exchangers, photocatalysts, and membranes, as summarized by Luukkonen et al. 10. Some of the outlined uses require modification of the geopolymers with metals. The proof-of-concept study for the use of geopolymers as antimicrobial materials was performed by O'Connor et al., who prepared an Ag +-exchanged, halloysite-based geopolymer and applied it successfully to inactivate Staphylococcus aureus on an agar plate 11. Metakaolin or fly ash geopolymers have also been modified with Ag-nanoparticles (AgNPs), and the resulting antimicrobial materials have been proposed to be used in construction 12,13. Furthermore, Cu 2+-exchanged metakaolin geopolymers have proved to be a promising antimicrobial material to be used against oyster mushroom hyphae 14. In (photo)catalytic water treatment applications, the successful impregnation of ca...