2004
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.1553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Diurnal Canopy Temperature Dynamics Using One‐Time‐of‐Day Measurements and a Reference Temperature Curve

Abstract: climate-dependent threshold time, then an irrigation event of a fixed depth is scheduled (Fig. 1). Evett et al.The application of the temperature-time threshold (TTT) method (1996, 2000) demonstrated in drip-irrigated plots that of irrigation scheduling to self-propelled irrigations systems requires a method of estimating the diurnal canopy temperature dynamics automatic irrigation using the TTT method was more using only a one-time-of-day measurement. Other research efforts responsive to plant stress and sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Crop canopy temperatures recorded from the moving irrigation system were averaged for the period of time it took for the system to move across each plot, and so represented a mean one-time-of-day plot-specific temperature. These plot-specific temperatures were scaled using the method of Peters and Evett (2004) to produce estimates of the plot temperature over the entire daytime. Wind speed (u z ) and solar radiation (R s , W m −2 ) were measured every 2 s at a height (z) of 2 m (using a RM-Young Wind Sentry Set and LI-COR 200SZ, respectively) using a datalogger (model CR10X, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT) located in plot 12 ( Fig.…”
Section: Canopy Temperature and Microclimate Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop canopy temperatures recorded from the moving irrigation system were averaged for the period of time it took for the system to move across each plot, and so represented a mean one-time-of-day plot-specific temperature. These plot-specific temperatures were scaled using the method of Peters and Evett (2004) to produce estimates of the plot temperature over the entire daytime. Wind speed (u z ) and solar radiation (R s , W m −2 ) were measured every 2 s at a height (z) of 2 m (using a RM-Young Wind Sentry Set and LI-COR 200SZ, respectively) using a datalogger (model CR10X, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT) located in plot 12 ( Fig.…”
Section: Canopy Temperature and Microclimate Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the pivot was moving when canopy temperature measurements were obtained, the center pivot passed over each plot during different times of the day, requiring a method to determine canopy temperature, T s , throughout the daylight hours for each remote measurement. We used the scaling procedure described by Peters and Evett (2004) …”
Section: Water Use and Water Use Efficiency Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With surface temperature typically measured at only one time of day for a given location, it is nonetheless possible to model diurnal surface temperature using the temperature scaling method of Evett (1989) and Evett et al (1994). This method was used by Peters and Evett (2004), who reformulated it for arrays of infrared thermometers aboard center pivots, which pass over different locations of the field at a single time of day, similar to satellites. The method has been successfully used to schedule center pivot irrigations and control crop water productivity for several crops, where the data thus generated were applied to algorithms such as the time-temperature threshold and time-integrated crop water stress index (e.g., Peters and Evett, 2008;O'Shaughnessy et al, 2011O'Shaughnessy et al, , 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time scaling methods were based on reference ET (Colaizzi et al, 2006) and a modeled diurnal surface temperature (Peters and Evett, 2004). Each time scaling method was tested using surface temperatures measured at five different times of the day.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%