2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1285(02)00004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling drop size distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
140
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
140
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Γ and RR PDFs have two parameters, while the NT has four parameters. However, the simplification of parameter p NT = 2 is common in the literature [16,26] which negligibly altered the R 2 value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Γ and RR PDFs have two parameters, while the NT has four parameters. However, the simplification of parameter p NT = 2 is common in the literature [16,26] which negligibly altered the R 2 value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it can be observed that there are larger R 2 values in general for higher atomization pressures. Hence, it can be stated that the quality of fit depends on the applied atomizing pressure and the widely applied RR PDF does not seem a superior choice over the others [15,16]. Note that this PDF was originally used for size characterization of coal particles after milling [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental work of Lefebvre and colleagues [2][3][4] provides analysis of the effect of nozzle design and flow parameters on important characteristics of the spray such as Sauter mean diameter, droplet size distribution, and cone angle. Theoretical investigations of pressure-swirl nozzles have contributed important formulations for key spray quantities such as Sauter mean diameter [5,6] and initial liquid film thickness within the discharge orifice [6,7] approaches for calculating drop size distributions of generalized sprays have been developed, and their predictive capabilities are thoroughly reviewed by Babinsky and Sojka [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%