2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling DTA by Combining Multiple-Instance Learning with a Private-Public Mechanism

Abstract: The prediction of the strengths of drug–target interactions, also called drug–target binding affinities (DTA), plays a fundamental role in facilitating drug discovery, where the goal is to find prospective drug candidates. With the increase in the number of drug–protein interactions, machine learning techniques, especially deep learning methods, have become applicable for drug–target interaction discovery because they significantly reduce the required experimental workload. In this paper, we present a spontane… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the Davis dataset, the MSE metric of the DoubleSG-DTA model was 0.219, 0.004 lower than the best DMIL-PPDTA [ 18 ] model in the sequence-based models, and the CI and metrics of our model were 0.902 and 0.725, 0.009 and 0.04 higher than FNN [ 20 ] model in the sequence-based models, respectively. When comparing with the best GraphDTA [ 11 ] model in the graph-based models, the CI value was increased by 0.009 and the MSE value was decreased by 4.37%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the Davis dataset, the MSE metric of the DoubleSG-DTA model was 0.219, 0.004 lower than the best DMIL-PPDTA [ 18 ] model in the sequence-based models, and the CI and metrics of our model were 0.902 and 0.725, 0.009 and 0.04 higher than FNN [ 20 ] model in the sequence-based models, respectively. When comparing with the best GraphDTA [ 11 ] model in the graph-based models, the CI value was increased by 0.009 and the MSE value was decreased by 4.37%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this part, we conducted experiments applying the MSE(↓), CI(↑), and (↑) to assess the DoubleSG-DTA method and previous studies on the above three benchmark datasets, including DeepDTA [ 8 ], GraphDTA [ 11 ], MATT-DTI [ 13 ], AttentionDTA [ 16 ], DeepCDA [ 17 ], and DMIL-PPDTA [ 18 ]. Besides, we also benchmarked our work against proteochemometrics methods [ 35 ], including the support vector machine (SVM), feedforward neural network (FNN), SimBoost [ 12 ], Random Forest (RF) [ 14 ], and KronRLS [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation