1988
DOI: 10.1109/8.8634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling electromagnetic wave propagation in the troposphere using the parabolic equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
96
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
96
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Both verification and validation refer to different inhomogeneous environments and a broad range of frequencies and propagation scenarios. A quite good agreement between the simulation results obtained with wide-angle SSF PE and GTD (Geometrical Theory of Diffraction) for propagation in standard troposphere over irregular terrain is reported in Barrios [45]; an excellent agreement is found in Dockery [67] comparing the PE and the rigorous normal-mode method for surface duct conditions; a favorable comparison for surface duct over a rough surface (with Miller-Brown RRF) between the SSF PE solution and normal-mode based solution is reported in Dockery and Kuttler [69]. A recent work, Apaydin and Sevgi [65], reports canonical test cases and systematic comparisons between the SSF-based and FE-based solutions to PE (1) as well as calibration of both solutions against analytically exact solutions.…”
Section: Validation Of the Pe And Limitations Of 2d Pesupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Both verification and validation refer to different inhomogeneous environments and a broad range of frequencies and propagation scenarios. A quite good agreement between the simulation results obtained with wide-angle SSF PE and GTD (Geometrical Theory of Diffraction) for propagation in standard troposphere over irregular terrain is reported in Barrios [45]; an excellent agreement is found in Dockery [67] comparing the PE and the rigorous normal-mode method for surface duct conditions; a favorable comparison for surface duct over a rough surface (with Miller-Brown RRF) between the SSF PE solution and normal-mode based solution is reported in Dockery and Kuttler [69]. A recent work, Apaydin and Sevgi [65], reports canonical test cases and systematic comparisons between the SSF-based and FE-based solutions to PE (1) as well as calibration of both solutions against analytically exact solutions.…”
Section: Validation Of the Pe And Limitations Of 2d Pesupporting
confidence: 59%
“…During the last two decades the numerical implementation of the PE solutions has been repeatedly verified through comparisons to other propagation models [33,34,45,65,67,69]. The adequacy of the PE method in modeling the radio wave propagation has been also extensively validated by means of comparisons to measured data [27,31,32,[89][90][91][92][93].…”
Section: Validation Of the Pe And Limitations Of 2d Pementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The internal propagation model for AREPS is a hybrid called the Advanced Propagation Model, which solves a parabolic approximation to the wave equation through use of split-step Fourier transforms (Dockery 1988). Factors such as range-dependent refractivity environments, variable terrain, range-varying dielectric ground constants for finite conductivity and vertical polarization calculations, troposcatter and gaseous absorption are taken into account in this model.…”
Section: Radar Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%