1998
DOI: 10.1029/97gl03613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling errors in diffuse‐sky radiation: Vector vs scalar treatment

Abstract: Abstract.Radiative transfer calculations that utilize the scalar approximation of light produce intensity errors as large as 10% in the case of pure Rayleigh scattering. This modeling error, which arises primarily from second order scattering, is greatly reduced for flux and albedo results because of error cancellation brought about by integration over scattering angle. However, polarized light scattered from an underlying ocean surface, or from atmospheric aerosols, interacts with the pattern of Rayleigh scat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neglecting polarization by scalar radiative transfer introduces errors in the modeled radiances, which can be as large as 10 % depending on the scattering geometry of the singly scattered light (Mishchenko et al, 1994;Stammes , 1994;Lacis et al, 1998). Consequently, one may argue that the use of the scalar radiative transfer solver in our LINTRAN forward model potentially causes retrieval biases depending on scattering geometry and subsequently on the solar zenith angles.…”
Section: The Scalar Radiative Transfer Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting polarization by scalar radiative transfer introduces errors in the modeled radiances, which can be as large as 10 % depending on the scattering geometry of the singly scattered light (Mishchenko et al, 1994;Stammes , 1994;Lacis et al, 1998). Consequently, one may argue that the use of the scalar radiative transfer solver in our LINTRAN forward model potentially causes retrieval biases depending on scattering geometry and subsequently on the solar zenith angles.…”
Section: The Scalar Radiative Transfer Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b), was run with a scalar radiative transfer solver, which did not take polarization into account. Lacis et al (1998) calculated that modelling errors for irradiance resulting from the omission of polarization in these calculations can be as large as 1.3 % for a Rayleigh atmosphere. However, errors for 310 and 337 nm (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a practical point of view, an important issue concerns the errors in the intensies of multiply scattered radiation when the incident light is unpolarized and the so-called scalar approximation is used, i.e., when polarization is completely ignored in the calculations. This has been investigated for a number of special cases Kattawar, 1970, 1993;Chandrasekhar, 1950;Hansen, 1971a,b;Van de Hulst, 1980;Adams, 1989, 1990;Mishchenko, Lacis, and Travis, 1994;Stammes, 1994Stammes, , 2001Lacis et al, 1998]. For light reflected by clouds of spherical particles with radii not smaller than the wavelength the errors in the intensities due to the scalar approximation were found to be smaller than about 1 %, but for atmospheres in which Rayleigh scattering plays an important role much larger errors may occur, since in that case the singly scattered light can be strongly polarized and this light is the input for multiply scattered light.…”
Section: Principle Of the Adding-doubling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%