1980
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1980.10465946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Evidence of Incloud Transformation Of Sulfur Dioxide to Sulfate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T h e oxidation may proceed via m any different reactions (Cox & Penkett 1983) with recent interest favouring reactions with H 20 2. T h e average contribution of solution and oxidation to the S O f-in precipitation rem ains uncertain, b u t is regarded (Gillani & Wilson 1983;M cN aughton & Scott 1980), as a m ajor com ponent. G arlan d (1978) estim ated th at the solution and oxidation of S0 2 w ithin clouds m ay contribute ca.…”
Section: Gasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T h e oxidation may proceed via m any different reactions (Cox & Penkett 1983) with recent interest favouring reactions with H 20 2. T h e average contribution of solution and oxidation to the S O f-in precipitation rem ains uncertain, b u t is regarded (Gillani & Wilson 1983;M cN aughton & Scott 1980), as a m ajor com ponent. G arlan d (1978) estim ated th at the solution and oxidation of S0 2 w ithin clouds m ay contribute ca.…”
Section: Gasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests used data for October 1977 and verification using this case was reported by McN aughton (1980), Scott (1980), andMcNaughton etal. The tests used data for October 1977 and verification using this case was reported by McN aughton (1980), Scott (1980), andMcNaughton etal.…”
Section: Case 1 -Base Casementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The need for increased in-cloud conversion rates, identified by McNaughton and Scott (1980) is accounted for by specifying a 5 % rate during precipitation events. The need for increased in-cloud conversion rates, identified by McNaughton and Scott (1980) is accounted for by specifying a 5 % rate during precipitation events.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies were conducted during dry periods. Following McNaughton and Scott, 24 the transformation rate for wet periods has been assumed to be 10% per hour. Figure 15 also shows that Model T includes wet and dry removal, as indicated by the horizontal arrows leaving the system either to the right (wet) or to the left (dry).…”
Section: Choices Of Model Transformation Andmentioning
confidence: 99%