2016
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Failure Process and Quantifying the Effects of Multiple Types of Preventive Maintenance for a Repairable System

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a repairable system whose failures follow a non‐homogenous Poisson process with the power law intensity function. The system is subject to corrective and multiple types of preventive maintenance. A corrective maintenance has a minimal effect on the system; however, a preventive maintenance may reduce the system's age. We assume the effects of different preventive maintenance on the system are not identical and derive the likelihood function to estimate the parameters of the failure p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other models were designed, generally with an estimation procedure, for example by Dauxois and Maalouf [6], Dauxois et al [7], Dijoux et al [8], Doyen et al [9], and Peng et al [10]. Some models also include preventive maintenances, as those exposed by Peng et al [11], Said and Taghipour [12] and Salles et al [13]. Preventive maintenances are carried out without the occurence of a failure.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models were designed, generally with an estimation procedure, for example by Dauxois and Maalouf [6], Dauxois et al [7], Dijoux et al [8], Doyen et al [9], and Peng et al [10]. Some models also include preventive maintenances, as those exposed by Peng et al [11], Said and Taghipour [12] and Salles et al [13]. Preventive maintenances are carried out without the occurence of a failure.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doyen (Nasr, Gasmi, & Sayadi, 2013). Said and Taghipour further expanded this by considering three maintenance types for PM events and minimal repair for CM events (Said & Taghipour, 2016). They derive the likelihood function for estimating the parameters of the failure process and the effects of preventive maintenance, as well as provide the conditional reliability and the expected number of failures between two consecutive PM types (Said & Taghipour, 2016).…”
Section: Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Said and Taghipour further expanded this by considering three maintenance types for PM events and minimal repair for CM events (Said & Taghipour, 2016). They derive the likelihood function for estimating the parameters of the failure process and the effects of preventive maintenance, as well as provide the conditional reliability and the expected number of failures between two consecutive PM types (Said & Taghipour, 2016). Other methods included using feed-forward artificial neural networks (ANN) on condition monitoring data with asset targets' being asset survival probabilities estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) and degradation failure probability density function (PDF) estimator (Heng, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yildirim [20] proposed an integrated framework for wind farm maintenance that combined predictive analytics methodology with an optimization model considering economic dependence and stochastic dependence. Shahraki [21] proposed a selective maintenance optimization method for complex systems composed of stochastically dependent components, which captures the two-way interaction between components through system performance rates. Although many models of maintenance dependence have been proposed, almost all existing studies only focus on one or two types of maintenance dependence, which cannot perfectly reflect the impact of all three types of dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%