2006
DOI: 10.1039/b516036g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling fluid diffusion using the lattice density functional theory approach: counterdiffusion in an external field

Abstract: The dependence of the diffusivity on temperature, pressure, and composition is not understood well; consequently, data is preferred significantly over correlations in most practical situations. Even in dilute gases, the contributions of attractions and repulsions to the diffusivity are difficult to understand on a molecular level without performing simulations. We have developed a Lattice Density Functional Theory (LDFT) approach for modeling diffusion to supplement existing methods that are very rigorous but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we adapt the analysis presented by Gouyet et al 21 to the case of a fluid confined in a pore, but it is important to note that the equations we derive are equivalent to those presented recently by Aranovich and co-workers [32][33][34] in their work on diffusion in porous materials. The dynamical theory embodied in these equations can be viewed as a mean field approximation to a dynamic Monte Carlo simulation of the system, as a theory of diffusion, or as a DDFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we adapt the analysis presented by Gouyet et al 21 to the case of a fluid confined in a pore, but it is important to note that the equations we derive are equivalent to those presented recently by Aranovich and co-workers [32][33][34] in their work on diffusion in porous materials. The dynamical theory embodied in these equations can be viewed as a mean field approximation to a dynamic Monte Carlo simulation of the system, as a theory of diffusion, or as a DDFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to configure a different type of steady state where we remove the periodic boundaries in the x-direction and place a control layer at each end of the system. If the control layers have different chemical potentials then the system can describe steady state mass transfer of fluid through the pore, as has been done by Matuszak et al [32].…”
Section: Dynamic Mean Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has its origin in the dynamic mean field theories of the Ising [43] and binary alloy [30] models first developed almost 20 years ago and reviewed by Gouyet et al [21]. It has also been used to model diffusion in membranes and bulk fluids by Matuszak et al [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar limitation was obtained using a phenomenological derivation of the differential mass balance and finite-difference diffusion equations [11,17]. (Some numerical aspects of solving finite-difference thermodynamic equations with multiple solutions were considered in [18,19] which can be useful for analysis of finite differences in fluid equilibrium [20][21][22] and diffusion [23][24][25]. )…”
Section: Conditions Necessary For Classical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%