2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-021-01648-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Fluid Flow in Fractured Porous Media with the Interfacial Conditions Between Porous Medium and Fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2010) derived the expression for the equivalent permeability coefficient of symmetric fracture‐matrix models under the velocity slip interface boundary condition (called the “B‐J” boundary (Beavers & Joseph, 1967)). However, for the study of flow field characteristics of some irregular and complex fracture‐matrix models, most of it is based on numerical simulation methods such as Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) (Landry et al., 2014; Landry & Karpyn, 2012), FEM (Hosseini & Khoei, 2021; Salimzadeh et al., 2017), and Finite difference method (FDM) (Z. Q. Huang et al., 2014; Yan et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2010) derived the expression for the equivalent permeability coefficient of symmetric fracture‐matrix models under the velocity slip interface boundary condition (called the “B‐J” boundary (Beavers & Joseph, 1967)). However, for the study of flow field characteristics of some irregular and complex fracture‐matrix models, most of it is based on numerical simulation methods such as Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) (Landry et al., 2014; Landry & Karpyn, 2012), FEM (Hosseini & Khoei, 2021; Salimzadeh et al., 2017), and Finite difference method (FDM) (Z. Q. Huang et al., 2014; Yan et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An enhanced version of DFN, based on the concept of fractured porous media, was proposed for modeling fluid flow in both the rock matrix and discrete fractures, where the flux interaction between them is allowed (Hoteit and Firoozabadi 2008b;Choo and Lee 2018;Berre et al 2019). Meanwhile, combined with the finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods, the DFN-based methods have gained many successes in simulation of hydraulic process as well as mechanical deformation (Gupta and Duarte 2018;Wang et al 2019bWang et al , 2020Hosseini and Khoei 2021;Wang et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in temperature with increased depth in the Earth, known as the geothermal gradient, is not uniform around the globe as this temperature rises in a range of 2-3 • C per 100 m of depth on average [2]. There are many numerical methods for related studies, such as the finite element method, which can provide a general analysis [3], and the boundary element method, which allows for more accurate calculation [4]. Numerical methods cannot quantify transfer in porous media as sufficiently as analytical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%