ObjectiveSmartphone applications (apps) with optical imaging capabilities are transforming the field of physical anthropometry; digital measurements of body size and shape in clinical settings are increasingly feasible. Currently available apps are usually designed around the capture of two‐dimensional images that are then transformed with app software to three‐dimensional (3D) avatars that can be used for digital anthropometry. The aim of the current study was to compare waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), four other circumferences (right/left upper arm, thigh) and WC/HC evaluated with a novel high‐precision 3D smartphone app to ground‐truth measurements made with a flexible tape by a trained anthropometrist.MethodsForty‐four participants aged 20–78 years and body mass index 18.5–48.5 kg/m2 completed digital and manual circumference evaluations and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for visceral adipose tissue mass (VAT).Results3D‐digital and ground‐truth tape WC, HC, and WC/HC estimates were highly correlated (R2s, 0.90–0.97, p < 0.001), mean 3D and tape group means at each site did not differ significantly, mean absolute (± SD) and root‐mean square errors were low (e.g., WC, 3.4 ± 2.6 and 4.4 cm), and strong concordance correlations were present (0.90–0.99); bias with Bland–Altman analyses was small but significant (p < 0.001) for WC and WC/HC. Comparable results were observed for the four other circumferences. VAT was equally well‐correlated with 3D and tape WC measurements (R2s 0.70, 0.69, both p < 0.001); comparable tape‐3D VAT‐WC/HC associations were also observed in males (R2s, 0.85, 0.73, both p < 0.001) and females (R2s, 0.43, p < 0.01; 0.73, p < 0.001).ConclusionsDigital anthropometry, with accessible technology such as the evaluated novel 3D app, has reached a sufficiently developed stage to go beyond body mass index for phenotyping patient's metabolic disease risks.