2018
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Hematological Diseases and Cancer With Patient-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Abstract: The advent of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) together with recent advances in genome editing, microphysiological systems, tissue engineering and xenograft models present new opportunities for the investigation of hematological diseases and cancer in a patient-specific context. Here we review the progress in the field and discuss the advantages, limitations, and challenges of iPSC-based malignancy modeling. We will also discuss the use of iPSCs and its derivatives as cellular sources for drug target ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(123 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…iPSCs have been used to model cancer cell heterogeneity, plasticity, tumor progression, drug resistance, and for drug screening (Campbell et al, 2020; Czerwińska et al, 2018; Kim, 2015; Sharkis et al, 2012). Also, iPSC reprogramming as a strategy to study cancer cell of origin has been successfully employed in several cancers with different strategies (Friedmann‐Morvinski & Verma, 2014; Czerwińska et al, 2018; Kim & Schaniel, 2018; Marin‐Navarro et al, 2018). One strategy to study cell of origin in cancer with iPSC is by direct reprogramming of tumor cells.…”
Section: Reprogramming Cancer Cells Into Ipsc: a Model For Assessing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPSCs have been used to model cancer cell heterogeneity, plasticity, tumor progression, drug resistance, and for drug screening (Campbell et al, 2020; Czerwińska et al, 2018; Kim, 2015; Sharkis et al, 2012). Also, iPSC reprogramming as a strategy to study cancer cell of origin has been successfully employed in several cancers with different strategies (Friedmann‐Morvinski & Verma, 2014; Czerwińska et al, 2018; Kim & Schaniel, 2018; Marin‐Navarro et al, 2018). One strategy to study cell of origin in cancer with iPSC is by direct reprogramming of tumor cells.…”
Section: Reprogramming Cancer Cells Into Ipsc: a Model For Assessing ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the myeloid lineage is dominant, and lymphoid hematopoiesis have been less well reconstituted. Thus, most in vitro iPSC hematopoietic disease models are myeloid types, such as MPD, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS and bone marrow failures [8]. Thirdly, the dominant types of hemoglobin in iPSC-derived erythrocytes are neonatal (HbE) or fetal (HbF), not adult-type HbA [33,[40][41][42].…”
Section: Hematopoiesis In Vivo Vs Hematopoiesis In Vitro From Ipscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The versatility of iPSCs is applicable to the field of hematopoiesis. One way is to recapitulate hematopoietic diseases, ranging from monogenic congenital diseases or myeloproliferative diseases (MPD) to multifactorial hematopoietic malignancies and bone marrow failures, by using iPSCs established from patients [ 7 , 8 ]. These models will contribute to uncovering the unknown pathogenesis or drug testing, thus leading to novel treatment modalities for the diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct conversion approaches to generate cells of the hematopoietic lineage from fibroblasts using a one-step approach or directed differentiation from human embryonic stem cells have been used as an alternative to somatic cell reprogramming followed by hematopoietic differentiation of iPSCs [51]. The use of iPSC model for hematological disorders with a focus on patient-specific iPSCs has been reviewed [50,[52][53][54]. The generation of isogenic pairs of normal and mutated iPSC lines using gene editing methodology helps in understanding the key role of specific mutations.…”
Section: Transposon-based Insertional Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%