2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12561-017-9210-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling High-Dimensional Multichannel Brain Signals

Abstract: Our goal is to model and measure functional and effective (directional) connectivity in multichannel brain physiological signals (e.g., electroencephalograms, local field potentials). The difficulties from analyzing these data mainly come from two aspects: first, there are major statistical and computational challenges for modeling and analyzing high dimensional multichannel brain signals; second, there is no set of universally-agreed measures for characterizing connectivity. To model multichannel brain signal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although different forms of Ψn can be considered depending on the application, sparse forms provide computationally reasonable choices, with the diagonal structure being the most commonly used (Basu and Michailidis, 2015; Hu et al ., 2017; Lin and Michailidis, 2017). In particular, choosing Ψn=αn𝕀d, with αn a scalar and 𝕀d the d×d identity matrix, corresponds to the case where the cross‐covariance between two observation points ( i and j ) at times tn and tn+1 is a fraction (αn) of the covariance between those two points at time tn (i.e., covvi,n+1,vj,n=αncovvi,n,vj,n).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although different forms of Ψn can be considered depending on the application, sparse forms provide computationally reasonable choices, with the diagonal structure being the most commonly used (Basu and Michailidis, 2015; Hu et al ., 2017; Lin and Michailidis, 2017). In particular, choosing Ψn=αn𝕀d, with αn a scalar and 𝕀d the d×d identity matrix, corresponds to the case where the cross‐covariance between two observation points ( i and j ) at times tn and tn+1 is a fraction (αn) of the covariance between those two points at time tn (i.e., covvi,n+1,vj,n=αncovvi,n,vj,n).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, matrix‐valued data are commonly encountered in brain images and signals, where the sampling unit can be viewed as a two‐dimensional array (ie, matrix), for example, electroencephalography (EEG) and local field potentials (LFPs). These signals are in general high‐dimensional and possess complicated structure such as spatial/temporal correlation, low rankness, and sparsity (Gao et al ., 2019; Hu et al ., 2019; Wang et al ., 2019). The main goal of this paper is to provide a novel approach for clustering matrix‐valued data while taking their complex structure into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the system's dimensionality increases substantially with 144pm 2 coefficients needed to be estimated. To provide an efficient regularization approach to estimate the model parameters, we rely on the method LASSLE proposed by Hu et al [14]. The latter consists of executing the estimation in two phases: a) identify the relevant covariates using a LASSO regression, and b) use an ordinary least square to estimate the coefficients and their uncertainty.…”
Section: Causality Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%