Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model

Abstract

BackgroundThe majority of curative health care is organized in hospitals. As in most other countries, the current 94 hospital locations in the Netherlands offer almost all treatments, ranging from rather basic to very complex care. Recent studies show that concentration of care can lead to substantial quality improvements for complex conditions and that dispersion of care for chronic conditions may increase quality of care. In previous studies on allocation of hospital infrastructure, the allocation is usually only based on accessibility and/or efficiency of hospital care. In this paper, we explore the possibilities to include a quality function in the objective function, to give global directions to how the ‘optimal’ hospital infrastructure would be in the Dutch context.MethodsTo create optimal societal value we have used a mathematical mixed integer programming (MIP) model that balances quality, efficiency and accessibility of care for 30 ICD-9 diagnosis groups. Typical aspects that are taken into account are the volume-outcome relationship, the maximum accepted travel times for diagnosis groups that may need emergency treatment and the minimum use of facilities.ResultsThe optimal number of hospital locations per diagnosis group varies from 12-14 locations for diagnosis groups which have a strong volume-outcome relationship, such as neoplasms, to 150 locations for chronic diagnosis groups such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).ConclusionsIn conclusion, our study shows a new approach for allocating hospital infrastructure over a country or certain region that includes quality of care in relation to volume per provider that can be used in various countries or regions. In addition, our model shows that within the Dutch context chronic care may be too concentrated and complex and/or acute care may be too dispersed. Our approach can relatively easily be adopted towards other countries or regions and is very suitable to perform a ‘what-if’ analysis.

Collaboration and Competition Policy in a Market-Based Hospital System: A Case Study from the Netherlands

“…In its informal opinion, the ACM assumed that patients were willing to travel further for better care for complex procedures. This argument is partly supported by the relevant academic literature: it has been shown that some patients are more inclined to travel further for higher quality of care, to a certain extent at least (Tanke and Ikkersheim, 2012;Ikkersheim et al, 2013;Gutacker et al, 2016;Middelveldt et al, 2018;Vallejo-Torres et al, 2018).…”

Designing hierarchical networks to improve patient access to care: a case study in veteran eye care

“…Key tools include linear programming, including integer and mixed-integer programming, and simulation models. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Operations researchers and industrial engineers, in collaboration with administrative decision-makers, can use these tools to develop models that represent real-world scenarios. Such models can have meaningful results that inform operationally feasible decisions.…”

Entrepreneurship, Economic Development and Public Policy in the Post-Pandemic World

“…It is worth mentioning that the use of infrastructure, understood as the number of beds, the number of diagnostic equipment and the number of operating theatres, are very often used in studies on the efficiency of the health care system [Rohrer, 1988;Sultan, Crispim, 2018;Büchner et al, 2016]. An interesting look at the medical infrastructure is presented by David Ikkersheim and his team [Ikkersheim, 2013]. They examine the degree of concentration of medical infrastructure in the context of the quality and effectiveness of care services in chronic diseases (general practitioners) and comprehensive and acute care (hospital).…”