2018
DOI: 10.3319/tao.2017.10.26.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Hydrological Impacts of Groundwater Level in the Context of Climate and Land Cover Change

Abstract: The study uses weather generation models to generate future daily rainfall and temperature, and incorporates a land coverage model to simulate future land use changes. These future scenarios are then simulated by a rainfall runoff model to study their impacts on basin discharge, river, and groundwater levels. The Fengshan Creek basin in northern Taiwan is selected as test site. The RCP2.6 scenario is adopted to project future climate. The hydrological impacts, in the context of groundwater, for the near future… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By manually adjusting MODFLOW parameter values to test their impact on model outputs, storage coefficients (SY and SS), horizontal hydraulic conductivity (HK), and two drain conductance (COND) were deemed as the potential sensitive parameters, with the value of HANI (the ratio of hydraulic conductivity along columns to hydraulic conductivity along rows) always being 1 and the values of VKA (the ratio of horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity) fixed being 3, 5, or 10 from the original MODFLOW set-up. For MODFLOW parameters, the originally calibrated and modified parameter values in the steady-state MODFLOW version were used as the initial parameter values in PEST, and a small range around the initial values was assigned as the parameter range according to the experience from manual calibration and representative values (derived from [72]).…”
Section: Swat-modflow Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By manually adjusting MODFLOW parameter values to test their impact on model outputs, storage coefficients (SY and SS), horizontal hydraulic conductivity (HK), and two drain conductance (COND) were deemed as the potential sensitive parameters, with the value of HANI (the ratio of hydraulic conductivity along columns to hydraulic conductivity along rows) always being 1 and the values of VKA (the ratio of horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity) fixed being 3, 5, or 10 from the original MODFLOW set-up. For MODFLOW parameters, the originally calibrated and modified parameter values in the steady-state MODFLOW version were used as the initial parameter values in PEST, and a small range around the initial values was assigned as the parameter range according to the experience from manual calibration and representative values (derived from [72]).…”
Section: Swat-modflow Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WASH123D has been applied to many regionally-significant projects and was chosen by the U.S. Army Corps as the core computational code for coast and watershed studies. A revamped version of the WASH123D model has also been applied to many flood mitigation and groundwater problems [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Groundwater Model: Wash123dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 illustrates all the hydrogeological units indicated above, and Table 1 lists these units and associated hydraulic conductivity values based on the pumping tests conducted by the CGS. The soil retention curves for the unsaturated zone were generated using the power-law-related model and assumed that the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the 3D subsurface flow in the horizontal direction was 10-times that in the vertical direction [28,30]. Regarding the surface parameter, Manning's coefficients (Mn) for the rivers was referenced to field investigations conducted by the WRA.…”
Section: Hydrogeological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The HEC-HMS it is one the most widely used and documented hydrological model, run several different studies. [15][16][17][18]…”
Section: Hydrological Modeling (Hec-hms)mentioning
confidence: 99%