2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling impacts of climate change on Joshua trees at their southern boundary: How scale impacts predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, species distribution models typically lack the spatial and biological detail required to predict the persistence of populations at the local level (Hampe and Jump 2011;Schwartz 2012). This lack of detail may have significant consequences on model output, even more so as fine-scale biological and landscape characteristics as well as microclimate buffering have been demonstrated to play a central role in species responses to climate change (Thuiller et al 2008;Randin et al 2009;Willis and Bhagwat 2009;Barrows and Murphy-Mariscal 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, species distribution models typically lack the spatial and biological detail required to predict the persistence of populations at the local level (Hampe and Jump 2011;Schwartz 2012). This lack of detail may have significant consequences on model output, even more so as fine-scale biological and landscape characteristics as well as microclimate buffering have been demonstrated to play a central role in species responses to climate change (Thuiller et al 2008;Randin et al 2009;Willis and Bhagwat 2009;Barrows and Murphy-Mariscal 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decisions regarding the placement of USSE infrastructure likely take into account current species distributions, but climate change may alter future distributions and wildlife dispersal corridors [52]. Determining species' responses to novel climate shifts is inherently uncertain and scale dependent, but nevertheless tools exist to model such distributional shifts (e.g., [11]). …”
Section: Indirect and Regional Effects On Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, non-native species can interact with other stressors such as climate change. In Joshua Tree National Park in the southern Mojave Desert, for example, Barrows and Murphy-Mariscal (2012) reported that projected future habitat of the park's namesake (Joshua tree, Yucca brevifolia, a fire-susceptible species) in a changing climate would continue to correspond with that of the fire-promoting, nonnative annual Bromus rubens. With continuation of novel fire regimes, it is unclear how many Yucca trees may still be around to even experience a future climate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, elevation extremes (below sea level and > 2,000 m) were least invaded in terms of non-native species richness. If climate becomes warmer and drier in the region as some projections suggest (Barrows and Murphy-Mariscal 2012), lower elevations might become even less invasible, and higher elevations more so. Forecasting how invasibility might change at high elevations is difficult, because high elevations may already be invasible and simply have not received seed pressure (Keeley et al 2003).…”
Section: Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%