2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-015-3147-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Intercalated Group-4-Metal Nitride Halide Superconductivity with Interlayer Coulomb Coupling

Abstract: Behavior consistent with Coulombmediated high-T C superconductivity is shown to be present in the intercalated group-4-metal nitride halides A x (S) y MNX, where the MNX host (M = Ti, Zr, Hf; X = Cl, Br) is partially intercalated with cations A x and optionally molecular species (S) y in the van der Waals gap between the halide X layers, expanding the basal-plane spacing d. The optimal transition temperature is modeled by T C0

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of these two disparate charge reservoirs is the probable source of differing conclusions regarding the ground-state symmetry in some high-T C superconductors [30]. At the time of this writing, this model has already been validated with a statistical deviation between the calculated and measured T C0 of ±1.35 K for 48 different layered materials from seven superconducting families (cuprates, ruthenates, rutheno-cuprates, iron-pnictides and ET-based [bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene] organics [27,31,32]; iron-chalcogenides [33]; intercalated group-4-metal nitride-halides [34,35]) with measured T C meas values ranging from ~7 to 150 K.…”
Section: Interlayer Coulombic Pairing Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of these two disparate charge reservoirs is the probable source of differing conclusions regarding the ground-state symmetry in some high-T C superconductors [30]. At the time of this writing, this model has already been validated with a statistical deviation between the calculated and measured T C0 of ±1.35 K for 48 different layered materials from seven superconducting families (cuprates, ruthenates, rutheno-cuprates, iron-pnictides and ET-based [bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene] organics [27,31,32]; iron-chalcogenides [33]; intercalated group-4-metal nitride-halides [34,35]) with measured T C meas values ranging from ~7 to 150 K.…”
Section: Interlayer Coulombic Pairing Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The interaction distance ζ is found by taking the average projected radial distance between a given C 60 ion, comprising the type I structure, and its nearest neighbor Cs ions, comprising the type II structure, noticing that for both the A15 and fcc structures, the Cs on interstitial sites are facing points on C 60 unoccupied by C. From this perspective, the Cs and C positions have direct correspondence to layered structures in, e.g. intercalated β-form group-4-metal nitride-halides [35].…”
Section: Application To Cubic a 3 C 60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essentially instantaneous nature of quasiparticle creation, compared to the significantly slower relaxation process, allows for 6 See e.g. equation (25) in [28] unscreened Coulomb interactions between electronic charges in adjacent reservoirs. Equation (1) thus derives fundamentally from quantum fluctuations within the virtual photon field between the two charge reservoirs inducing Compton scattering of quasiparticles confined essentially within their respective reservoirs.…”
Section: Derivation Of T C0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory predicts T C0 for optimal superconductors, which are identified experimentally by maxima in transition temperatures governed by controlling doping, structure, and externally applied pressure. Calculations of T C0 have been previously validated against experiment with statistical accuracy of ±1.30 K or ±4% in T C0 for 51 different superconductors from nine superconducting families, consisting of the aforecited 3D compounds [50,51], layered cuprates, ruthenates, rutheno-cuprates, iron pnictides, BEDT-based [bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene] organics [49,52,53], iron chalcogenides [54], and intercalated group-4-metal nitride-chlorides [55,56], with measured superconducting transitions ranging from ~7 to 200 K.…”
Section: Interlayer Coulomb Pairing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairing in this model is ascribed to Coulomb interactions between charges in adjacent reservoirs separated by a distance ζ via the exchange of virtual photons, with T C0 scaling with the root of the participating charge density 1/ℓ multiplied by the potential energy e 2 /ζ (where e is the electron charge). In prior work, this approach has been successfully applied to 51 compounds from nine unique superconducting families, ascertained by accurately deriving T C0 [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. For TBG devices, the two gate-charged graphene layers, separated by average distance ζ, comprise the interacting reservoir structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%