Modeling journal bibliometrics to predict downloads and inform purchase decisions at university research libraries

Abstract

University libraries provide access to thousands of online journals and other content, spending millions of dollars annually on these electronic resources. Providing access to these online resources is costly, and it is difficult both to analyze the value of this content to the institution and to discern those journals that comparatively provide more value. In this research, we examine 1,510 journals from a large research university library, representing more than 40% of the university's annual subscription cost for electronic resources at the time of the study. We utilize a web analytics approach for the creation of a linear regression model to predict usage among these journals. We categorize metrics into two classes: global (journal focused) and local (institution dependent). Using 275 journals for our training set, our analysis shows that a combination of global and local metrics creates the strongest model for predicting full-text downloads. Our linear regression model has an accuracy of more than 80% in predicting downloads for the 1,235 journals in our test set. The implications of the findings are that university libraries that use local metrics have better insight into the value of a journal and therefore more efficient cost content management.

Understanding impulse purchase in Facebook commerce: does Big Five matter?

“…The skewness and kurtosis were less than 1 indicating a normal distribution. Similar to Coughlin and Jansen (2015), normality is also validated by the normal P-P plot (Figure 3). Furthermore, the VIF is less than 10 and tolerance is greater than 0.1, thus implying no multicollinearity problem (Lin and Lu, 2015).…”

Pixel efficiency analysis: A quantitative web analytics approach

“…Specifically, databases within the academic library world refer to bundles of electronic resources. The library in question spends millions of dollars per year on these databases (Coughlin & Jansen, ), so conversions (i.e. clicking on a database) and having visitors return are KPIs for the page.…”

“…The library in question spends millions of dollars per year on these databases (Coughlin & Jansen, 2015), so conversions (i.e. clicking on a database) and having visitors return are KPIs for the page.…”

Transition to open: A metrics analysis of discoverability and accessibility of LIS scholarship

“…Downloads are 'a good surrogate for usage' with an added advantage of being a simple measure. 16 A download, even if it does not result in a citation, can indicate 'respect' for research 15 , an interest in it and intention to read it. Altmetrics, which count social media activity at the article level (for example, recommendations and 'captures' such as bookmarks and saves of the online article) 17 can, along with views and downloads, be used to complement traditional metrics.…”