2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2004.02.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling language competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
130
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
130
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present paper aims to present such a model. In fact, very interesting quantitative models on language interaction do exist [7][8][9][10][11], but they do not seem to deal with the problem of explaining the geographical spread rate of the expanding language. In contrast, the model in the present paper makes it possible to quantify the e¤ect of di¤erent processes and parameters on the speed of language replacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present paper aims to present such a model. In fact, very interesting quantitative models on language interaction do exist [7][8][9][10][11], but they do not seem to deal with the problem of explaining the geographical spread rate of the expanding language. In contrast, the model in the present paper makes it possible to quantify the e¤ect of di¤erent processes and parameters on the speed of language replacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to such limitations, the model was revised and extended by many authors, especially from the field of (statistical) physics. Patriarca and Leppänen (2004) and Patriarca and Heinsalu (2009) include spatial components in their adoptions of the AS model. Taking geographical inhomogeneities into account they were able to show that it is possible that both languages survive in two different geographical regions.…”
Section: Language Competition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In Wickström (2014) it is illustrated that the A-S model and its extension by Minett and Wang (2008) can be reformulated in terms of the general model presented in Wickström (2005). Furthermore the spatial model in Patriarca and Leppänen (2004) can be interpreted as a version of the Wickstr'om framework with two subpopulations I and II, which value language A differently. It is shown that under some general assumptions on the nexus between transition probabilities and the size of the subpopulations stable steady states of the system are the same as derived by Patriarca and Leppänen (2004) in spatial terms.…”
Section: Language Competition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their study considers a two-state society, that is, one in which there are speakers of either a language A or a language B. This seminal work, as well as others along the same line [7,8], belongs to the general class of studies of population dynamics based on nonlinear ordinary differential equations for the populations of speakers of different languages. In addition, other studies implement discrete agent based models with speakers of many [9,10] or few languages [11,12], as reviewed in [9,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%