2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling learned categorical perception in human vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results relate to a debate, both, in the categorization literature (Roberson and Davidoff, ; Goldstone et al., ; Notman et al., ; Casey and Sowden, ) and in pain research (Wiech et al., ; Woo et al., ), on how fundamentally prior information influences perception. Are the effects on pain perception we find in our data mainly a reinterpretation following sensory processing or is it a phenomenon affecting perception earlier, at the level of nociception?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our results relate to a debate, both, in the categorization literature (Roberson and Davidoff, ; Goldstone et al., ; Notman et al., ; Casey and Sowden, ) and in pain research (Wiech et al., ; Woo et al., ), on how fundamentally prior information influences perception. Are the effects on pain perception we find in our data mainly a reinterpretation following sensory processing or is it a phenomenon affecting perception earlier, at the level of nociception?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our results provide first evidence that a higher‐level cognitive process which warps perception to fit discrete categories, exists in animals without a visual cortex. Our findings therefore challenge the notion that CP is a phenomenon which requires higher‐order processing in a hierarchical system, such as the visual cortex (Casey & Sowden, 2012) and opens the possibility for either a much simpler explanation for CP (Yu et al, 2017), or the existence of a complex processing system in the fish brain. Future research is required to explore those possibilities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Perceptual learning occurs for different kinds of tasks at different levels of visual analysis (figure 1). It improves detection or discrimination for single features such as orientation (Dosher & Lu 1998, Dosher & Lu 1999, Schoups et al 1995, Vogels & Orban 1985), spatial frequency (Bennett & Westheimer 1991, Fiorentini & Berardi 1981), phase (Dosher et al 2010, Fiorentini & Berardi 1980), contrast (Adini et al 2004, Dorais & Sagi 1997, Sowden et al 2002), color (Casey & Sowden 2012, Özgen & Davies 2002, Thurston & Dobkins 2007), acuity (Bennett & Westheimer 1991, Westheimer 2001), and hyper-acuity (Crist et al 1997, McKee & Westheimer 1978, Poggio et al 1992). It improves pattern discrimination in tasks involving compound stimuli (Fiorentini & Berardi 1980, Fiorentini & Berardi 1981), textures (Ahissar & Hochstein 1993, Karni & Sagi 1991), depth (Fendick & Westheimer 1983, Ramachandran & Braddick 1973), and motion (Ball & Sekuler 1982, Lu et al 2006, Lu et al 2005, Matthews & Welch 1997, Watanabe et al 2002).…”
Section: Observing Perceptual Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%