1997
DOI: 10.1177/027836499701600104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Mechanisms with Nonholonomic Joints Using the Boltzmann-Hamel Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McPhee (1996) showed how to use linear graph theory in multibody system dynamics. Cameron and Book (1997) described a technique based on Boltzmann-Hamel equations to derive dynamic equations of motion. Comprehensive discussion on dynamic formalisms can be found in the seminal text by Roberson and Schwertassek (1988), Schiehlen (1990Schiehlen ( , 1997, Shabana (2001), and Wittenburg (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McPhee (1996) showed how to use linear graph theory in multibody system dynamics. Cameron and Book (1997) described a technique based on Boltzmann-Hamel equations to derive dynamic equations of motion. Comprehensive discussion on dynamic formalisms can be found in the seminal text by Roberson and Schwertassek (1988), Schiehlen (1990Schiehlen ( , 1997, Shabana (2001), and Wittenburg (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition (27) geometrically means that each of the column vectors of A (1,2) belongs to the linear space orthogonal to the space generated by the columns of Γ 1 or equivalently, by virtue of (28), that it is a linear combination of the row vectors of α 1 . Owing to Properties 3.1 and 3.2, if assumptions (H1) and (H2) are met, then the matrix of coefficients (20) is simplified into…”
Section: Remark 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and they are totally disentangled from the so called reconstruction equations (30), which play in some sense the same role as (2). The same procedure cannot be employed for nonholonomic systems, because of the kinematics relations: actually, the occurrence of a cyclic coordinate does not entail the constancy of the corresponding momentum, as (9) exhibits.…”
Section: Eliminating Some Of the Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems with nonholonomic constraints have been reduced to explicit differential equation in various ways as well, in the context of geometric mechanics and Ehresmann connections [4], and in the context of port-Hamiltonian systems and Poisson brackets [5], [6]. Both holonomic and nonholonomic constraints have been treated in the framework of Kane's equations [7], [8] and Boltzmann-Hamel equations [9], which use a type of quasi-coordinates as we do here, but are nevertheless restricted to joints with a Euclidean joint space. This paper, which is based partially on [10], presents a systematic method that is valid for general non-Euclidean holonomic and nonholonomic joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%