2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(00)00055-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling micro-end-milling operations. Part II: tool run-out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate the chip thickness of the machined material, Bao and Tansel [42,43] proposed a cutting force model that considered the effect of tool tip trajectory. However, this model did not consider the effect of the negative rake angle of the cutting tool and elastic-plastic deformation of the workpiece material in micro-cutting; both of these factors significantly differ from that in macro-cutting.…”
Section: Micro-cuttingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the chip thickness of the machined material, Bao and Tansel [42,43] proposed a cutting force model that considered the effect of tool tip trajectory. However, this model did not consider the effect of the negative rake angle of the cutting tool and elastic-plastic deformation of the workpiece material in micro-cutting; both of these factors significantly differ from that in macro-cutting.…”
Section: Micro-cuttingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spindle Runout: The problem of small chip thickness is complicated by the fact that typical milling spindles have radial runout at the tool tip on the order of 1 to 2 micrometers or more [3] [4]. This means that in ordinary operation, some teeth on the cutter may not contact the workpiece at all during rotation, while others are forced to cut chips up to several times the desired thickness.…”
Section: Cutting Edge Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutting tools are also scaled by the same factor. If the spindle speed is constant for both operations, the feed rate must scale by a factor of k 2 to maintain a constant bending stress in the tool, while the axial and radial depths of cut each scale by the factor, k. Therefore, the MRR scales by k 4 , while the volume of material to be removed scales by k 3 . This means that if a certain mechanical component is to be created by an end milling operation and a geometrically similar component one-tenth the size is also to be created, the operation will take approximately ten times as long to complete.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-developed cutting force model with precise force prediction can assist operators in choosing the optimal cutting parameters; furthermore, the predicted toolworkpiece dynamic displacement can be used for tool path adjustment in order to increase the accuracy of machined parts and reduce tool breakage [7][8][9]. Therefore, developing an accurate cutting force model becomes imperative for micro milling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%