2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9584-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Microbial Growth Curves with GCAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Background absorbance was subtracted from the average of three negative controls (media without cells). Kinetic parameters for each condition were calculated in GCAT [91]. Average and standard deviations from two independent biological replicates were calculated in R [92].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background absorbance was subtracted from the average of three negative controls (media without cells). Kinetic parameters for each condition were calculated in GCAT [91]. Average and standard deviations from two independent biological replicates were calculated in R [92].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such measures can be made in parallel in a plate reader, and may result in hundreds or thousands of absorbance measurements over the course of 24 h. The resulting growth curves are commonly used in a variety of microbiological experiments [ 1 3 ], including experimental evolution [ 4 7 ]. A variety of methods have been used to obtain metrics from such growth curves [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 8 13 ]. Older methods relied on manually plotting the cell count or absorbance readings over time on semi-log graph paper to obtain metrics like the maximum growth rate [ 8 ], an approach which has been computationally mirrored recently by GrowthRates [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fitting growth curves, several alternatives exist3181920, which, although mostly focusing on parametric approaches, do allow spline fitting3 and polynomial regression1820. Both approaches have been criticized, being sensitive to outliers and potentially having systematic biases5, and at least in the case of splines appear less robust (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%