Handbook of Electroporation 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Microbial Inactivation by Pulsed Electric Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeling conducted by Singh et al (2017) has a lower error, which is less than 5% with an electric field intensity of 9-21 kV/cm, but its application has not been reported at lower electric field intensities. Similar modeling was also carried out by Peleg (2017) by giving a treatment using an electric field of 8.0 -20.0 kV/cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling conducted by Singh et al (2017) has a lower error, which is less than 5% with an electric field intensity of 9-21 kV/cm, but its application has not been reported at lower electric field intensities. Similar modeling was also carried out by Peleg (2017) by giving a treatment using an electric field of 8.0 -20.0 kV/cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) or the onset of inactivation after sustained growth [24]. At least in principle, stochastic models can also be written for scenarios that include cell division, injury and damage repair [36] and simultaneous activation and inactivation of bacterial spores [11].…”
Section: Runmentioning
confidence: 99%