SAE Technical Paper Series 2009
DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-2426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Mission Operations Trade Spaces and Lunar C3I Capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, EVAs are performed with small crews being supported by a large group of experts on Earth in the Mission Control Center. The personnel in Mission Control are responsible for processing and monitoring the majority of the necessary information streams and keeping the astronauts safe during EVA [29], [30]. There is evidence that this current model of EVA is incompatible with the time-delayed communication constraints and the communication blackout periods that come with human deep-space missions [31], and is also not scalable to situations where they may be more than one EVA being performed simultaneously [15].…”
Section: Human-robotic Cooperation For Human Spaceflight Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, EVAs are performed with small crews being supported by a large group of experts on Earth in the Mission Control Center. The personnel in Mission Control are responsible for processing and monitoring the majority of the necessary information streams and keeping the astronauts safe during EVA [29], [30]. There is evidence that this current model of EVA is incompatible with the time-delayed communication constraints and the communication blackout periods that come with human deep-space missions [31], and is also not scalable to situations where they may be more than one EVA being performed simultaneously [15].…”
Section: Human-robotic Cooperation For Human Spaceflight Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The loss of human crew members is considered a much higher political or social cost, and not just economic cost, affecting mission planning. 18,19,20 ) However, humans demonstrate unique recovery capabilities and flexibility of strategic reorganization/reprioritization skills that still exceed all known artificial intelligence and automation systems (especially when also considering human skill at on-site physical manipulations and repair of engineering components). Suffice it to say that machine automation and human expertise represent complementary forms of system resilience and robustness.…”
Section: -Paul Valerymentioning
confidence: 99%